Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Reading Rheum

Gail C. Davis, RN, EdD; Eric S. Schned, MD  |  Issue: July 2007  |  July 1, 2007

Two randomized, placebo-controlled trials with similar designs have recently been published, exploring the role of infliximab in treating patients with early GCA and PMR respectively. Disappointingly, both studies came to the same conclusion: Infliximab is of no benefit in either disease.

In the first of these studies, Hoffman and a group of international collaborators investigated the effects of infliximab in patients with GCA. These investigators randomized 44 patients with newly diagnosed GCA (less than four weeks’ duration) in a 2:1 ratio to receive infliximab, 5 mg/kg, or placebo at Weeks 0, 2, and 6, and every eight weeks thereafter. Patients had already achieved remission with GCCs. GCCs were then tapered in a carefully prescribed fashion so that, in the absence of a relapse, GCC dosage of 10 mg/day would be achieved at four months and would be discontinued by six months.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Importantly, as the data in this study indicate, the proportion of patients who were relapse-free through Week 22 (a primary study end point) was similar between infliximab and placebo patients (43% versus 50%; p=0.65).

Further, secondary study end points were also not different between infliximab and placebo groups: cumulative dose of GCCs at Week 22 (3,154 mg versus 3,049 mg; p=0.95); t­he proportion of patients who remained relapse-free during taper of GCCs to 10 mg/day (61% versus 75%; p=0.31); mean GCC dose at relapse (13.4 mg/day versus 11.8 mg/day; p=0.59); and biochemical markers of inflammation (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and interleukin-6 levels).

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

There was no difference in the proportion of patients who achieved complete remissions, defined as no sign of active GCA for at least 12 weeks after cessation of GCCs: 39% versus 44% (p=1.00). Of the patients who achieved complete remission, 73% of the infliximab group and 86% of the placebo group later had a relapse. Of note, there was no difference in the frequency of adverse events or serious adverse events between the two groups. Thus, while the addition of infliximab was safe, it did not add benefit.

In view of the putative role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of GCA, these results may appear surprising. There are several explanations for the failure of infliximab to show activity. The authors acknowledge that a higher dose of infliximab might have been efficacious. Also, methotrexate was not administered concomitantly with infliximab and this might have altered efficacy. However, only about one-quarter of patients developed anti-infliximab antibodies 20 weeks after the last dose was administered, so that lack of efficacy could not be attributed to anti-drug antibodies.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Research Rheum Tagged with:LiteraturePainReading Rheum

Related Articles

    Is Acupuncture for Pain a Placebo Treatment?

    November 1, 2010

    An examination of the evidence

    Two Inflammatory Conditions—Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis—Share Clinical Connection

    March 1, 2013

    Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) have common clinical and epidemiologic links, but they need not occur synchronously

    Permanent Vision Loss in Late Giant Cell Arteritis

    October 18, 2018

    Patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) or peripheral arthritis may require extra vigilance during treatment because of a suspected link to giant cell arteritis (GCA) and, potentially, permanent vision loss. “Development of giant cell arteritis after treating polymyalgia or peripheral arthritis: a retrospective case-control study,” a March 2018 study published in The Journal of Rheumatology, suggests…

    Updates on Giant Cell Arteritis

    March 19, 2018

    SAN DIEGO—Recent research tells us more about giant cell arteritis (GCA) to help rheumatologists more accurately diagnose and effectively treat patients with this type of vasculitis. On Nov. 6 at the ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, three experts explored the latest findings on GCA pathogenesis, diagnostic approaches, imaging modalities and growing treatment options. GCA: What’s Really Happening?…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences