Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Rheumatologist Elected to Key AMA Committee That Helps CMS Set Medicare Reimbursements

Leslie Mertz, PhD  |  February 10, 2025

Dedicated Work

Before becoming a RUC member, Dr. Barré held the position of RUC advisor trainee. “He learned a lot as a trainee, and we were delighted when he expressed a desire to continue on,” says Dr. Laing. “As I become more and more age-challenged, shall we say, it’s become increasingly important to have somebody who can go forward on the RUC because it’s a very detail-oriented process, and it takes a while to not only learn it, but also feel confident that you understand all the nuances of it.”

The committee meets three times per year to discuss and vote on payment code recommendations. For those meetings, which last four to five days each, members receive assigned subsets of payment codes to evaluate. They must gather information from societies and their surveys, practitioners and other sources and present concise but comprehensive assessments to the RUC for a vote, explains Ms. Chung. In this way, the RUC presents the CMS with fact-based consensus recommendations.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Despite the time commitment—up to 15 days in the RUC meetings, not to mention long hours learning about the broad range of physician services and procedures and writing code evaluations—Dr. Barré feels his decision to participate on the RUC is the right one. “I think it comes down to recognizing that somebody has to do it,” he says. “Somebody has to advocate for patient access and equitable patient care, and some of that comes down ultimately to making sure that the care can be sustainably delivered. And that means being at the table.”

Besides that, he remarks, “I get to be surrounded by leaders from all these other specialty societies. I am forming natural relationships with people from other specialties. These are people who have similar interests and are also interested in understanding how we can work together to accomplish shared goals.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

A Collective Voice

Dr. Laing has a similar perspective about serving on the RUC, which he described as “building the house of medicine.” He explains, “One reason to have rheumatology involved in the RUC is to help out with a large effort that benefits all of us: creating a system that appropriately values medical procedures and services. So, by agreeing to participate as a society, we’re basically saying we are willing to take our place in that altruistic effort.”

At the same time, participation also benefits the field of rheumatology, Dr. Barré says. Often, codes are shared across specialties, so although members do not vote on their own payment codes, they collaborate with others who also use rheumatology codes, examine different societies’ survey results, discuss codes with society advisors and help frame the collective views on rheumatology codes that are ultimately presented to the RUC for a vote. “These codes touch every single rheumatologist and therefore every single patient who enters the rheumatologist’s office, so we need to be represented on the RUC,” he says.

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:InsuranceLegislation & AdvocacyPractice Support Tagged with:AMA Relative Value Update Committee (RUC)Medicare Reimbursement

Related Articles

    The Relative Value Update Process: Your Input Makes a Difference

    November 5, 2021

    Selected ACR members will be invited to participate in a survey from the AMA Relative Value Update Committee. If you do, respond by the listed date. Data from these surveys helps set Medicare and other payer reimbursement rates.

    How Rheumatologists Are Paid: Luke Barré, MD, Joins AMA Committee That Helps Shape Physician Fee Schedule

    October 7, 2022

    The American Medical Association’s Relative Value Update Committee advises the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on appropriate reimbursement rates for specialty services. Luke Barré, MD, MPH, RhMSUS, is learning the ropes as the ACR’s newest representative.

    How to Decipher the American Medical Association’s Billing, Coding Processes

    April 15, 2016

    The American Medical Association consists of two key groups: 1) the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC), which oversees the annual updates to the physician work relative values, and 2) the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Editorial Panel, which assigns new or revised codes in the CPT book. The CPT Process Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) was…

    What Do Your Patients Think About You?

    May 9, 2012

    Why your practice needs patient-satisfaction surveys

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences