Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Ethics Forum: Unexpected Ethical Issues in Private Practice, Clinical Research

Donah Zack Crawford, MA, Jill Johnson, MD, Neal K. Moskowitz, MD, PhD, & James Udell, MD  |  Issue: July 2016  |  July 14, 2016

Although our patients may not request specific medications the way television commercials say they should, they do ask us for things. Sometimes, the things they ask for are hard, or even impossible, because of our medical opinions, our beliefs, our egos and our faith that we, and medicine, will ultimately prevail.

In each of these cases, we were asked to do something we weren’t expecting. To comply was difficult and/or potentially unethical. Each of these situations tested our resolve to do the right thing. These cases create tension between competing priorities, including the basic bioethical tenets of patient autonomy, justice, beneficence and non-maleficence.2

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Even when the best choice is clear, we may be tempted to make a different choice, especially given all the unfairness in healthcare delivery. Protocol criteria exclude patients who would benefit from study treatments. Co-pays put biologicals out of reach for many. Other practitioners and our patients may ask the impossible. So sometimes the question is less about what to do and more like, “Wait, what? You want me to do what?”

How should these cases be handled? Good communication, patience and resolve are good starting points. Don’t be afraid to ask a trusted colleague what they would do or look to the published literature for advice.1,3,4 Once you’ve considered the question carefully, don’t hesitate to draw a line in the sand. Often, the answer to difficult requests we face should be “No, I cannot do that—and here’s why.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Donah Zack Crawford, MADonah Zack Crawford, MA, is the director of clinical trials at the Arthritis Group in Philadelphia, a member of the ARHP Programming Committee and a past ARHP representative to the ACR Committee on Ethics and Conflict of Interest.
 

Jill Johnson, MDJill Johnson, MD, is a staff physician at the Arthritis Group.

 

Neal K. Moskowitz, MD, PhDNeal K. Moskowitz, MD, PhD, is a staff physician at the Arthritis Group.

 

James Udell, MDJames Udell, MD, is director and principle investigator of the Arthritis Group. He is a member of the ACR Communications and Marketing Committee, and immediate past president of The Philadelphia Rheumatism Society.

 

References

  1. The American Medical Association Code of Medical Ethics. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics.page.
  2. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed. Oxford University Press, 2012.
  3. Antommaria AHM, Bramlage KS. Enrolling research participants in private practice: Conflicts of interest, consistency, therapeutic misconception, and informed consent. AMA J Ethics. 2015 Dec;17(12):1122–1126.
  4. Friedman E. The Right Thing: Ten Years of Ethics Columns from Healthcare Forum Journal. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996.

Editor’s note: If you have questions, comments or a case you’d like to see in Ethics Forum, email us at [email protected].

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:EthicsPractice SupportResearch Rheum Tagged with:ClinicalEthicspatient carePractice ManagementQualityResearchRheumatic Diseaserheumatologistrheumatology

Related Articles

    Are You Informed About Informed Consent?

    May 1, 2008

    Physicians walk a fine line between informed consent and patient trust

    Ethics Forum: The Ethical Challenges of Recruiting Patients for Clinical Trials

    February 1, 2014

    A successful recruiter raises concerns about balancing friendliness and enthusiasm with legal and ethical constraints when screening human subjects for research

    Updated ACP Ethics Manual Provides 6-Step Approach to Dilemmas

    January 15, 2019

    NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—The 2019 edition of the American College of Physicians (ACP) ethics manual provides a six-step approach to resolving ethical dilemmas and adds or expands sections that address emerging issues in 21st century medicine.1 “The Manual provides succinct guidance on issues that affect the patient-physician relationship, and also issues that have to do…

    AMA Updates Code of Medical Ethics

    January 17, 2017

    Eight years ago, the American Medical Association’s (AMA) Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs embarked on a comprehensive review of the AMA Code of Medical Ethics. What emerged after years of hard effort, intensive feedback and thoughtful revisions was a modernized version of the guide, which the AMA House of Delegates voted to adopt in…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences