Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Rheumatology Coding Corner Answer: Documentation Improvement

From the College  |  Issue: May 2016  |  May 13, 2016

Take the challenge.

  1. B—No. Although the documentation states the patient arrived at the clinic at 8:15 a.m. and left the clinic at 10:55 a.m., it does not document the actual start and stop times of the infusion. According to CPT, when reporting codes for which infusion time is a factor, use the actual time over which the infusion is administered. Medicare considers this as “drip to drip”; documentation of time begins when the medication starts and ends at the time of completion of the medication.
  2. D—A and B. 20611—Arthrocentesis, aspiration and/or injection, major joint or bursa (e.g., shoulder, hip, knee, subacromial bursa); with ultrasound guidance, with permanent recording and reporting. There must be documentation of whether the left or right knee was injected and if performing a joint injection via ultrasound guidance; there must be permanent recording and documentation to that effect. The E/M visit would be a Level 4 visit, as the history was detailed, the exam was expanded problem focused and the medical decision making was moderate complexity. This was an established patient, so only two of the three of the history, exam or medical decision making are needed.
  3. D—All of the above. In order to get to the ICD-10 code M16.11—Unilateral primary osteoarthritis, right hip, there must be documentation of the following three items:
    • The type of osteoarthritis (e.g., primary, secondary or post-traumatic);
    • Anatomical site (e.g., hip, knee, shoulder, etc.); and
    • Location (e.g., right or left).

    The E/M visit would be a Level 4 visit, as the history was detailed, the exam was expanded problem focused and the medical decision making was moderate complexity. This was an established patient, so only two of the three of the history, exam or MDM are needed.

  4. D—A and C. When counseling and/or coordination of care dominates (more than 50%) the physician–patient and/or family encounter (face-to-face time in the office or other outpatient setting), time is considered the key or controlling factor to qualify for a particular level of E/M services. Documentation guideline: If the physician elects to report the level of service based on counseling and/or coordination of care, the total length of time of the encounter (face to face, as appropriate) should be documented, and the record should describe the counseling and/or activities to coordinate care:
    • The total time of the visit;
    • More than 50% of the visit was spent face-to-face counseling and/or coordinating the care of the patient; and
    • What was discussed during the counseling and/or coordination of care.
  5. E—The chief complaint for the follow-up visit. All payers require a reason for every encounter, even if the patient is only seen for a procedure. Without a valid chief complaint, some carriers may consider the visit as not medically necessary. The codes for the encounter would be 96401 and J9250x2.
ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingFrom the CollegePractice Support Tagged with:BillingCodingPractice Managementrheumatologistrheumatology

Related Articles

    Use Time Component When Coding Counseling, Coordination of Care Visits

    April 17, 2017

    Although there are seven components for the levels of evaluation and management (E/M) services, most encounter levels are coded on the basis of the history, examination and medical decision making (MDM), which are the key components extracted from documentation in the medical record. However, when counseling and coordination of care for a patient are the…

    Exercise Therapy Recommended to Manage Knee Osteoarthritis

    July 12, 2016

    The benefits of exercise therapy for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) are well known. The ACR strongly recommends both aquatic exercise and land-based aerobic and resistance exercise for managing knee OA.1 A recent Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that high-quality evidence supports the use of exercise to reduce pain and improve physical function and…

    Unexpected Benefits of Bisphosphonates after Hip Fracture

    February 3, 2012

    Recent trials show this bisphosphonates can reduce subsequent hip fractures and mortality, while remaining cost effective.

    Electronic Health Record Documentation Guidelines

    January 19, 2018

    The operations management team in healthcare practices is expected to have an effective coding compliance program in place that is continually evaluated and reevaluated. To accurately assess the program’s effectiveness, several outcome indicators must be measured, including error rates in the provider’s documentation and the electronic health record (EHR). Due to increased scrutiny by the…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences