Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Rheumatology Coding Corner Answer: Evaluation for Possible Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

From the College  |  Issue: November 2017  |  November 9, 2017

Take the challenge.

CPT codes: 99245/99205

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

ICD-10: M79.1, R21, R53.83, L65.9, K13.79, R00.0

This visit can be billed out as a 99245 only if the insurance carrier allows the billing of consultation codes. If the carrier does not allow consult codes, then this visit must be billed as a new patient visit.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Because many outpatient visits lack definitive diagnosis at the time of service, keep in mind that possible, probable, suspected or rule-out problems should not be coded until a definitive diagnosis has been made. In this case, it is acceptable for providers and coders to code the signs and symptoms to meet outpatient coding guidelines.

History: The HPI was extended, the ROS was complete, and all elements of the past, family and/or social history (PFSH) were documented, making the history comprehensive in level.

Examination: Using the 1995 documentation guidelines, eight organ systems were examined:

  • Constitutional;
  • Ear, nose, mouth and throat;
  • Cardiovascular;
  • Respiratory;
  • Gastrointestinal;
  • Musculoskeletal;
  • Skin; and
  • Neurological.

The documentation for the exam supports a comprehensive level.

Medical decision making: The number of diagnoses or treatment options, and new problems with additional work-up plan make this section of the MDM extensive. The amount of data and/or complexity of data to be reviewed contain orders for labs and medical test (ECG); these orders make this section level low. The level of risk of complications and/or morbidity or mortality is of a high level for the acute or chronic illness and pose a threat to life. This makes the MDM a high-complexity level for this visit.

For questions or additional information on coding and documentation guidelines, contact Melesia Tillman, CPC-I, CPC, CRHC, CHA, via email at [email protected] or call 404-633-3777 x820.

Share: 

Filed under:From the College Tagged with:BillingCodingoffice visitpatient carePractice Managementrheumatology

Related Articles
    Prepare NOW for ICD-10 Medical Coding Transition

    Prepare NOW for ICD-10 Medical Coding Transition

    July 14, 2015

    The ICD-10 page on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) website features a countdown clock that shows the time left until Oct. 1, 2015, the date on which compliance with the new code set becomes mandatory. By the time this issue goes to press, the clock will read 90 or fewer days. Time…

    Coding Corner Answer: February Coding Challenge

    February 1, 2014

    Coding for an office visit by a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis who is evaluated before starting a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor

    A New Era of Coding Evaluation & Management Services

    January 25, 2021

    After 25 years, the American Medical Association (AMA) Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) office and outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) codes received a major overhaul. These changes, which went into effect Jan. 1, will help reduce administrative burden on providers and roll back some of the rigid requirements for E/M coding by simplifying the code selection…

    Documentation Guidelines for Proper Medical Decision Making

    June 13, 2017

    Rawpixel.com/shutterstock.com The Medical Decision Making (MDM) of an evaluation and management (E/M) visit is one of the three components of determining the level of a patient’s visit. But the MDM can sometimes be the most difficult component, as this is where the provider’s thought process is quantified in deciding the correct level of E/M service. In…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences