Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Rheumatology Coding Corner Question: Documentation Improvement

From the College  |  Issue: May 2016  |  May 13, 2016

  1. A 55-year-old female patient returns for her second infliximab infusion. Her temperature is 98°F, her height is 5’6″ and her weight is 151 lbs. She received 210 mg infliximab via infusion. The patient arrived at the clinic at 8:15 a.m. and left at 10:55 a.m. Can this encounter be coded correctly?
    1. Yes
    2. No
  2. A 38-year-old female patient with secondary osteoarthritis returns to the practice for her second in a series of four injections of the knee. The area was prepped in the usual sterile manner. The needle was inserted into the affected area, and the steroid was injected via ultrasound guidance. The patient tolerated the procedure well without complications. Standard post-procedure care is explained and return precautions are given. What is missing from this documentation?
    1. Indication of laterality (left or right knee)
    2. Documentation of permanent recording of the image
    3. Nothing is missing
    4. A and B
  3. A 66-year-old male patient is in the office for a follow-up of his osteoarthritis. A detailed history was taken, an expanded problem exam was done, and the medical decision making was of moderate complexity. The diagnosis code billed out is M16.11. What is missing from the documentation?
    1. Type of osteoarthritis
    2. Anatomical site
    3. Location
    4. All of the above
    5. Nothing is missing
  4. A 62-year-old male patient returns to the office for a follow-up visit for gout in his left foot. The patient’s present uric acid level is 4.0. Notes indicate an extended history and expanded problem-focused exam, and the medical decision making was low complexity due to limited data. The documentation of the history, exam and medical decision making would normally make this a Level 3 visit (99213). The total time for the visit was 35 minutes, but more than 50% of the visit was spent on counseling. This service is billed as 99214, and time is being used as the determining factor to bill for this level of visit. What is missing from this documentation for time as the key element?
    1. The counseling and/or coordinating care was face to face
    2. How long the counseling and/or coordinating of care was
    3. What was discussed during this counseling and/or coordinating of care
    4. A and C
    5. A, B and C
  5. A patient returns for a follow-up visit for her methotrexate injection of 10 mg. What is wrong with this documentation?
    1. Nothing is missing; the documentation is complete
    2. The patient’s weight
    3. The review of systems is missing
    4. The sex of the patient
    5. The chief complaint for the follow-up visit

Click here for the answer.

Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingFrom the CollegePractice Support Tagged with:BillingCodingPractice Managementrheumatologistrheumatology

Related Articles

    Rheumatology Coding Corner Answer: Documentation Improvement

    May 13, 2016

    Take the challenge. B—No. Although the documentation states the patient arrived at the clinic at 8:15 a.m. and left the clinic at 10:55 a.m., it does not document the actual start and stop times of the infusion. According to CPT, when reporting codes for which infusion time is a factor, use the actual time over…

    Use Time Component When Coding Counseling, Coordination of Care Visits

    April 17, 2017

    Although there are seven components for the levels of evaluation and management (E/M) services, most encounter levels are coded on the basis of the history, examination and medical decision making (MDM), which are the key components extracted from documentation in the medical record. However, when counseling and coordination of care for a patient are the…

    Electronic Health Record Documentation Guidelines

    January 19, 2018

    The operations management team in healthcare practices is expected to have an effective coding compliance program in place that is continually evaluated and reevaluated. To accurately assess the program’s effectiveness, several outcome indicators must be measured, including error rates in the provider’s documentation and the electronic health record (EHR). Due to increased scrutiny by the…

    Clinical Documentation Improvement Programs Can Protect Physicians

    August 1, 2014

    CDI programs can validate patient care, support accurate coding practices, evidence-based care for quality-reporting measures

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences