Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

The RUC’s Work & Where You Fit In

Mary Beth Nierengarten  |  January 4, 2016

To ensure adequate and appropriate reimbursement, rheumatologists must provide detailed information about their services to the people advocating on their behalf. With the proper information, advocates can then do the work necessary to secure the appropriate values for these services.

These advocates are members of the Relative Value Update Committee (RUC), a volunteer committee of the American Medical Association (AMA) that makes recommendations annually to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) on appropriate values for medical services.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

RUC = Representation
The AMA established the RUC, along with the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Committee, to guarantee that physician services across all specialties are well represented. The CPT committee makes decisions on coding and nomenclature, then the RUC committee takes the new or revised codes and advocates for fair reimbursement on physician work based on the codes.

Currently, the RUC comprises 31 physicians and 300 medical advisors representing various specialties.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Where ACR Members Fit In
Tim Laing, MD, the current panel member representing rheumatology on the RUC, emphasizes that ACR members play a vital role in the advocacy efforts of the RUC committee.

“The RUC process is where all the codes are reviewed,” he says, emphasizing that the probability of preserving the value of an existing code or obtaining an optimal value of new codes is increased if you have membership in the RUC committee.

As such, Dr. Laing says it is important for ACR members to maintain or consider joining the AMA because only societies with 1,000 members or more are allowed to participate in the RUC and CPT committees.

Survey Completion Is Crucial
Another critical role that rheumatologists play is in completing the RUC surveys sent by the ACR staff to obtain the needed information used for valuing the codes. Generating the relative value recommendation is done using a specific survey method that was developed by the RUC. These fees are based on what is called the Resource Based Relative Value Unit System (RBRVS), a fee structure that puts a relative (versus an absolute) dollar value on physician work. The components of the RBRVS include physician work (50.9%), practice expense (44.8%) and professional liability insurance (4.3%)

The two basic components used to determine the relative value of physician work are time and intensity, says Dr. Laing. “In simple terms, how much time does it take to perform a service, and how difficult is it to perform that service?”

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingPractice SupportProfessional Topics Tagged with:codesCodingCPTCurrent Procedural Terminology Committee (CPT)Relative Value Update CommitteeRUCRUC surveys

Related Articles

    How Rheumatologists Are Paid: Luke Barré, MD, Joins AMA Committee That Helps Shape Physician Fee Schedule

    October 7, 2022

    The American Medical Association’s Relative Value Update Committee advises the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on appropriate reimbursement rates for specialty services. Luke Barré, MD, MPH, RhMSUS, is learning the ropes as the ACR’s newest representative.

    How to Decipher the American Medical Association’s Billing, Coding Processes

    April 15, 2016

    The American Medical Association consists of two key groups: 1) the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC), which oversees the annual updates to the physician work relative values, and 2) the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Editorial Panel, which assigns new or revised codes in the CPT book. The CPT Process Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) was…

    The Relative Value Update Process: Your Input Makes a Difference

    November 5, 2021

    Selected ACR members will be invited to participate in a survey from the AMA Relative Value Update Committee. If you do, respond by the listed date. Data from these surveys helps set Medicare and other payer reimbursement rates.

    Value for Service: ACR Update on RUC & CPT Activities

    April 4, 2019

    The American Medical Association (AMA) Relative Value Update Committee (RUC) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) meet three times a year to keep the CPT code set up to date and review resource costs for physicians. The two-step meetings of the CPT Editorial Panel and the RUC allow physicians to provide direct input to the Centers…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences