Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

S.C. Rheumatism Society Benefits from ACR Partnership

Gretchen Henkel  |  April 6, 2017

Editor’s note: This article will be the first in a series of articles highlighting the advocacy work done by state and local societies around the country.

The South Carolina Rheumatism Society (SCRS) realizes multiple benefits from its association with the ACR, according to Jeffrey G. Lawson, MD, the society’s treasurer. One example of the support offered: A coalition comprising representatives from the SCRS, the ACR, the Arthritis Foundation and other interested

Jeffrey G. Lawson, MD, the South Carolina Rheumatism Society’s treasurer.

stakeholders advocated for the introduction of H.B. 3438, the biosimilars substitution bill sponsored by State Representative Phyllis Henderson. If the bill passes, South Carolina will join its neighbors, Georgia and North Carolina, in rewriting parts of the state’s pharmaceutical code to allow for the substitution of biosimilars for their reference biologics.

H.B. 3438 Benefits & Concerns
Since March 2015, 28 states have taken advantage of the pathway established by the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009, which created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products that are demonstrated to be highly similar (biosimilar) to or interchangeable with an FDA-approved biological product. The FDA approved the first biosimilar in the United States in March of 2015. But because current South Carolina legislation does not specifically address biosimilars, the ability to substitute them has not been an option, either for rheumatologists or pharmacists. “Having this law in place will allow that [substitution] process to occur,” says Dr. Lawson.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Another key provision of H.B. 3438 would set up specific communications between pharmacists and physicians. Specifically, the bill would require pharmacists to communicate to the prescribing physician within five days when a substitution of an FDA-approved biosimilar for a name-brand biologic has occurred.

In an opinion column to the Greenville Journal on Feb. 12, 2017, Rep. Henderson wrote that the impetus for her sponsorship of the bill was to ensure that patients with chronic illnesses could have access to drugs that could relieve pain, and that, “for many families, biosimilars could potentially mean financial relief.” However, Dr. Lawson says, the extent of any financial benefit remains to be seen.

SCRS Background
Dr. Lawson has been active with the SCRS since 1979, when he founded the Piedmont Arthritis Clinic, a four-physician private practice serving upstate South Carolina, western North Carolina and northern Georgia. Through its membership in the ACR’s Affiliate Society Council, the SCRS has access to myriad other resources, such as practice management programs; information on state and federal legislation; and yearly presentations from certified professional coders. These services—along others such as with model bylaw assistance, and access resources including ACR templates for drug safety, Medicare, insurance and patient documentation—are provided free of charge to Affiliate Society Council members.

The SCRS Annual Meeting, organized by the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), will take place at the Mills House Wyndham Grand Hotel in Charleston, April 21–23. In addition to presentations from MUSC rheumatology fellows, the topics will range from spondyloarthropathy to complex gout, psoriatic arthritis, and sleep and rheumatic disease. For more information, visit the society’s webpage.


Gretchen Henkel is a medical journalist based in California.

Page: 1 2 | Multi-Page
Share: 

Filed under:Legislation & AdvocacyProfessional Topics Tagged with:Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009biosimilar substitutionsH.B. 3438South Carolina Rheumatism Society

Related Articles

    Marching to the Biosimilar Beat: Questions on Rollout Remain

    September 7, 2023

    The availability of biosimilars for the treatment of patients with rheumatic diseases exploded in 2023. Here’s where we stand and what to expect going forward.

    Possible Impact of Biosimilar Infliximab on U.S. Market in Prescriptions, Pricing

    September 8, 2016

    paulista/shutterstock.com The use of biosimilars for rheuma­tology in the U.S. became a reality when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb), a biosimilar to Remicade (infliximab), in April. What this may mean is increased competition among drug companies with regard to pricing and, therefore, potentially lower costs for U.S. patients, according to…

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    April 15, 2016

    Biosimilars are much bigger and more complex on the molecular level than small- molecule drugs. On the right is the small-molecule structure of aspirin (21 molecules). On the left is a monoclonal antibody made up of 10,000–20,000 molecules. The various biosimilar drugs depicted include monoclonal antibodies, scFv, Fab, and scFab, whereas the small-molecule drugs are…

    The Biosimilars Debate Heats Up: Potential cost savings weighed against patient health & safety

    March 1, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences