Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Safety First

Kurt Ullman  |  Issue: August 2008  |  August 1, 2008

Next would be to understand the proposed mechanism of action. More importantly, does the mechanism make sense from a pharmacokinetic and biological standpoint? “I am also interested in knowing if the sponsor is interested in the mechanistic impacts of the molecule in addition to just safety parameters,” says Dr. Aranow. “We are exposing people to a new agent. To not learn as much as possible while exposing them to risk would be a crime.”

Finally, discuss what the animal studies have shown to be toxicity concerns. Also, ask about what has been discovered about the toxicity profiles of similar molecules. “To me it is a belief in the mechanism and belief that the company will continue to move the molecule forward if the safety looks good,” says Dr. Buyon. “It is a partnership between the investigator, the sponsor, and the participant.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

What happens after the study is over is an ethical concern that should be discussed at length with a participant. Although Phase 1 trials are not specifically focused on efficacy, the potential for efficacy remains, or the molecule would not a viable candidate for study. So, what happens if there is a therapeutic benefit to an individual? It is not always possible from a protocol perspective to include those participating in the Phase 1 trial in later-stage trials. Thus, another part of the informed consent is to make sure that subjects know they may not have access to the drug unless it reaches the market as much as a decade later.

“These are mainly short-term trials lasting six to 12 weeks at the most,” says Christine Barr, RN, CCRC, clinical research coordinator at the Center for Rheumatology in Albany, N.Y. “In reality, many with chronic illnesses get into these studies to find some relief. What comes after is an important consideration that should be addressed early in the process.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Family and Patient Concerns Sometimes Conflict

Taking into consideration the personal concerns of the patient’s family with the needs of the study is an especially tricky balancing act. What should happen when the potential participant is eager, but a spouse or adult child is hesitant?

“When this occurs, I speak to the family members and ask what their concerns are,” says Dr. Aranow. “Much of the time, it will be that there was something the family member misunderstood and the objections go away with the misunderstanding. Sometimes the family just doesn’t want the study participant to take part in any kind of research, period.”

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsResearch RheumSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Tagged with:clinical trialsResearchSafetySLE

Related Articles

    Office Visit

    November 1, 2006

    A Day in the Life of Cynthia Aranow, MD

    Ocular Disease Monitoring Critical to Avoid Retinal Toxicity from Hydroxychloroquine

    November 16, 2016

    Both due to its efficacy and favorable side effect profile when compared with alternative drugs for rheumatologic conditions, hydroxychloroquine is an important agent in rheumatologists’ armamentarium. However, one barrier to hydroxychloroquine use can be its effects on the eye (also see “Revised Retinopathy Screening Guidelines,”). Ocular side effects of hydroxychloroquine can include impact on the…

    Hydroxychloroquine Retinopathy Still Alive and Well

    May 16, 2011

    How rheumatologists are affected by new guidelines from ophthalmology

    The 2021 ACR Awards of Distinction & Distinguished Fellows

    December 16, 2021

    During ACR Convergence 2021 in early November, the ACR honored a group of individuals who have made significant contributions to rheumatology research, education and patient care, announcing the recipients of the ACR’s 2021 Awards of Distinction, as well as the group of Distinguished Fellows. recognized for their contributions. Three pediatric rheumatologists and one pediatric fellow…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences