The Rheumatologist
COVID-19 NewsACR Convergence
  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed
  • Home
  • Conditions
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • SLE (Lupus)
    • Crystal Arthritis
      • Gout Resource Center
    • Spondyloarthritis
    • Osteoarthritis
    • Soft Tissue Pain
    • Scleroderma
    • Vasculitis
    • Systemic Inflammatory Syndromes
    • Guidelines
  • Resource Centers
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis Resource Center
    • Gout Resource Center
    • Psoriatic Arthritis Resource Center
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
  • Drug Updates
    • Biologics & Biosimilars
    • DMARDs & Immunosuppressives
    • Topical Drugs
    • Analgesics
    • Safety
    • Pharma Co. News
  • Professional Topics
    • Ethics
    • Legal
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Career Development
      • Certification
      • Education & Training
    • Awards
    • Profiles
    • President’s Perspective
    • Rheuminations
    • Interprofessional Perspective
  • Practice Management
    • Billing/Coding
    • Quality Assurance/Improvement
    • Workforce
    • Facility
    • Patient Perspective
    • Electronic Health Records
    • Apps
    • Information Technology
    • From the College
    • Multimedia
      • Audio
      • Video
  • Resources
    • Issue Archives
    • ACR Convergence
      • Gout Resource Center
      • Axial Spondyloarthritis Resource Center
      • Psoriatic Arthritis
      • Abstracts
      • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence Home
    • American College of Rheumatology
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Research Reviews
    • ACR Journals
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
    • Rheumatology Image Library
    • Treatment Guidelines
    • Rheumatology Research Foundation
    • Events
  • About Us
    • Mission/Vision
    • Meet the Authors
    • Meet the Editors
    • Contribute to The Rheumatologist
    • Subscription
    • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Search
You are here: Home / Articles / Similar Outcomes with Early or Late Mobilization After Rotator Cuff Repair

Similar Outcomes with Early or Late Mobilization After Rotator Cuff Repair

February 6, 2017 • By Rita Buckley

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version / Save PDF

NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—Early or late mobilization after rotator cuff surgery appears to yield similar outcomes, according to a new meta-analysis.

You Might Also Like
  • Lipids, Statin Treatment Linked to Revision Rate After Rotator Cuff Repair
  • Ultrasound May Be Useful for Grading Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
  • How to Diagnose Shoulder Pain

Dr. Bruno Fles Mazuquin from the University of Central Lancashire in the U.K., and colleagues conducted an overview of systematic reviews comparing the effectiveness of early and conservative rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The final analysis included 10 systematic reviews and 11 randomized controlled trials. Most of the systematic reviews were published between 2014 and 2015.

Only reports on chronic tears (i.e., those not caused by trauma or accidents) were included. All patients were under the supervision of a rehabilitation therapist.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“The starting time for rehabilitation also had great variance among the primary studies, from the same day post-surgery to four weeks in the early management, and from four to eight weeks in the conservative group,” the authors note.

Based on two studies with 207 patients, there were no statistically significant differences in pain at six or 24 months of follow-up.

Nor were there statistical differences in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire score between the early rehabilitation and conservative rehabilitation groups at six months (based on three studies with 312 patients), 12 months (two studies with 214 patients) or 24 months (two studies with 207 patients).

ad goes here:advert-3
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Similarly, there were no statistical differences in the Constant-Murley score between the early and conservative rehab groups, based on three studies with 312 patients at six months and two studies with 214 patients at 12 months.

In addition, there were no differences between the early and later groups in Simple Shoulder Test scores at six or 12 months, glenohumeral flexion ROM at six or 24 months, or retear rate at 12 months.

The findings indicate that early mobilization does not improve functional outcomes, pain or range of motion when compared with conservative rehabilitation, nor does it cause a higher retear rate, the authors conclude.

They note that there’s a lack of consensus on which is the best approach due to the heterogeneity of protocols and methodological quality of reviews and primary studies.

“The rehabilitation protocol used after rotator cuff repair is extremely important, but there is controversy regarding the ideal prototype,” says Dr. Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, consultant and professor of orthopedic surgery and director of shoulder and elbow surgery at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.

The current trend is to delay passive range of motion, he says.

“This is due in part to the widespread use of arthroscopic surgery, as well as a relatively high rate of incomplete tendon healing or retear reported by some authors,” says Dr. Sanchez-Sotelo, who was not part of the study.

However, patients are quite limited for a number of weeks after surgery, and their overall experience could potentially be improved with faster recovery, he says, noting that long-term physical therapy also has financial implications for healthcare systems.

Dr. Arun Ramappa, chief of sports medicine and shoulder surgery at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, says early range of motion has been postulated to more rapidly normalize range of motion, reduce pain, and normalize function.

“However, there is concern that it will lead to increased retear or failure rates of rotator cuff repair,” he writes in an email to Reuters Health.

Immediate range of motion after rotator cuff repair is not essential for producing good postoperative outcomes, says Dr. Ramappa, who was not involved in the study.

“This study highlights the need to use different study designs in the future to answer a question that remain unanswered despite much good quality research performed to date,” says Dr. Sanchez-Sotelo.

The main features of future studies should include subgroup analysis, compliance monitoring, and a homogeneous method to assess healing, he says.

The corresponding author did not respond to requests for comments.


Reference

  1. Mazuquin BF, Wright AC, Russell S, et al. Effectiveness of early compared with conservative rehabilitation for patients having rotator cuff repair surgery: an overview of systematic reviews. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Dec 30. pii: bjsports-2016-095963. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-095963. [Epub ahead of print]

 

Pages: 1 2 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Conditions, Osteoarthritis Tagged With: joint mobilization, mobilization, Physical Therapy, rotator cuff, shoulder, surgery

You Might Also Like:
  • Lipids, Statin Treatment Linked to Revision Rate After Rotator Cuff Repair
  • Ultrasound May Be Useful for Grading Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
  • How to Diagnose Shoulder Pain
  • Can Nasal Tissue Be Used to Repair a Damaged Knee Joint?

Meeting Abstracts

Browse and search abstracts from the ACR Convergence and ACR/ARP Annual Meetings going back to 2012.

Visit the Abstracts site »

Simple Tasks

Learn more about the ACR’s public awareness campaign and how you can get involved. Help increase visibility of rheumatic diseases and decrease the number of people left untreated.

Visit the Simple Tasks site »

Rheumatology Research Foundation

The Foundation is the largest private funding source for rheumatology research and training in the U.S.

Learn more »

The Rheumatologist newsmagazine reports on issues and trends in the management and treatment of rheumatic diseases. The Rheumatologist reaches 11,500 rheumatologists, internists, orthopedic surgeons, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who practice, research, or teach in the field of rheumatology.

About Us / Contact Us / Advertise / Privacy Policy / Terms of Use / Cookie Preferences

  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed

Copyright © 2006–2023 American College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

ISSN 1931-3268 (print)
ISSN 1931-3209 (online)