Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

When Starting Biologics for RA, Disease Severity Predicts Likelihood of Remission

Reuters Staff  |  March 22, 2017

NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—After starting biologic therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), patients with higher disease activity at baseline achieved greater improvements in measures of disease activity than those with lower levels of disease, but they were less likely to achieve remission or even low disease activity, according to a new real world analysis of registry data.

“These results raise the possibility that there might be a greater likelihood of achieving aggressive treatment targets, such as LDA [low disease activity] or remission, if biologic therapy is initiated before patients reach higher levels of disease activity,” Dr. Arthur Kavanaugh of the University of California, San Diego, and colleagues write in their report, published online on March 8 in Rheumatology.¹

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In clinical trials, baseline disease activity is correlated with disease activity after initiation of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), but real world data on patients who start treatment at different levels of disease activity is limited, the researchers note.

To investigate, they looked at registry data on patients with moderate disease activity (Clinical Disease Activity Index score greater than 10, but no higher than 22) or severe disease activity (CDAI above 22).

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

At least one year of follow-up data was available on 1,596 patients, and 1,269 had at least two years of follow-up. Each group contained a roughly equal amount of moderate and severe RA patients.

At one year, improvement in disease activity was -18.9 in patients with severe RA and -6.0 in patients with moderate RA. At two years, improvement was -21.0 and -7.1, respectively.

Among patients with moderate disease, 22.7% achieved remission (CDAI of 2.8 or less) at one year, compared with 15.8% of those with severe RA. At two years, 25.9% and 20.9% were in remission, respectively.

LDA or remission were achieved at one year by 60.1% of patients with moderate disease and 41.2% of those with severe disease, and at two years by 66.7% and 49.4%, respectively.

At one year, more than 70% of patients were on the same drug, while more than 62% were on the same drug at two years.

“These data suggest that patients and physicians may be willing to accept treatment responses that are perceived as successful, even if they have not achieved the target of LDA,” the researchers write. “Therefore, modification of T2T (target to treat) goals may be warranted for some RA patients, for example, those with high disease activity and/or long-standing RA.”

Dr. Kavanaugh was not available for an interview request by press time.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:biologic drugsbiologic therapiesRemissionRheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Related Articles

    3 AC&R Study Summaries: Fractures in Patients with SSc, Clinical Response in JIA, & TV & the Public Perception of Gout

    August 13, 2023

    Fractures in Patients with SSc By Zsuzsanna McMahan, MD, MHS Why was this study done? To minimize disability due to systemic sclerosis (SSc), it’s important to prevent and manage complications. Many SSc complications and related medications may increase the risk for osteoporosis and fracture. We sought to identify modifiable risk factors for fracture in patients…

    Target Remission

    March 1, 2007

    Strategies to identify and track remission in your RA patients

    2015 Treatment Recommendation Updates for Psoriatic Arthritis Address Comorbidities, New Medications

    November 16, 2016

    In May, the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) published its recommendations for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).1 The updated recommendations represent advances in drug development and availability since previous recommendations published in 2009, as well changes in treatment paradigms and the importance of associated aspects of the disease.2…

    The Dual-Target Strategy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Put Patients First

    October 13, 2021

    The impressive progress of medical knowledge and technology reinforces our trust in the scientific methodology that made it all possible. However, that progress also creates risks related to the primary goal of medical care: to serve our patients’ interests and enjoyment of life in the best possible way. In this article we present our views…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences