Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Table Stakes: The Right to Healthcare

Philip Seo, MD, MHS  |  Issue: May 2019  |  May 17, 2019

Medicare for Some

“Whereas most Western democracies had adopted some form of national healthcare program, the United States relied on a private system that revolved, as the sociologist Paul Starr had recounted, around a sacred understanding of the doctor-patient relationship. When liberals talked about giving the government a bigger role in healthcare, stakeholders in the existing system always fought back protecting their authority and autonomy by warning that Washington would sever the ties between doctors and their patients.”2

That was in the 1940s.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In the 1950s, the American Medical Association (AMA) financed a full-throated campaign to oppose President Harry Truman’s proposal for national healthcare insurance. The AMA averred that socialized medicine would threaten the clinical—and perhaps more importantly, the economic—independence of physicians. The AMA quickly branded the effort un-American, and the legislation died in committee.

Commerce abhors a vacuum, and into the void went commercial insurance companies, supported by employers and egged along by favorable laws. The turning point was World War II. The war effort led to an increased demand for goods, which, in turn, led to low levels of unemployment. Pure capitalism would generally dictate that salaries would rise as a result. To prevent prices from spiraling out of control, however, the federal government imposed limits on both wages and prices.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Leave it to American ingenuity to discover a workaround: If companies could not raise wages, they would provide fringe benefits. Benefits, such as sick leave and health insurance, were not wages, and were therefore not subject to wage controls. And thus, a patchwork of private insurance became cemented into the American healthcare system.

This system, of course, neglected to address the elderly, who were simultaneously more likely to require healthcare services and less likely to be able to obtain the commercial insurance necessary to pay for those services. Medicare was created with the hope that, in the words of President Lyndon Johnson, “Older Americans would no longer be denied the healing miracle of modern medicine.”

The AMA was still not convinced. They declared Medicare was “at least nine parts evil to one part sincerity” and was “the beginning of the end of the private practice of medicine.”3

Despite this, Medicare became wildly popular. It now represents 20% of all national healthcare expenditures and 14% of the federal budget.4 It is difficult to find anyone whose life is not touched by Medicare, either personally or professionally.

In the 50 years since Medicare was enacted, it has transformed from heresy to gospel. But it was intended to be much more: Reformers picked the elderly as a sympathetic beneficiary of a bold new entitlement. With time, it was expected that Medicare would gradually expand to cover all Americans.5 Unfortunately, changing political winds made such expansion unpalatable. The momentum behind healthcare reform faded, and Medicare’s mandate has remained largely unchanged to the present time.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:OpinionRheuminationsSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:Medicare for AllOpinion

Related Articles

    Moonshot: Apollo 11, Vaccines & Other Conspiracies

    September 14, 2021

    On July 20, 1969, at 10:56 p.m. EDT, American astronaut Neil Armstrong stepped off the lunar landing module, Eagle, and walked on the moon.1 Or so they would have you believe. ad goes here:advert-1ADVERTISEMENTSCROLL TO CONTINUEFor most, the basic facts are not in dispute: On May 25, 1961, President John F. Kennedy delivered a speech…

    Rheuminations: Why I Don’t Use the Term ‘Stakeholder’

    August 13, 2023

    Modern healthcare is, for better or for worse, the hybrid of many different fields—some that are expected, such as biomedical science, and others that are less well appreciated, such as astrology and palmistry. One modern contributor to healthcare is management. Nowadays, we’re inundated with all sorts of jargon from the business and policy worlds: turnover,…

    Space & Other Races

    October 19, 2020

    On April 5, 1950, a small group of scientists met in Silver Spring, Md., to talk about geophysics. I know this is not the most riveting way to start, but if you stick with me, I promise the story will get much more interesting. ad goes here:advert-1ADVERTISEMENTSCROLL TO CONTINUEThis group of scientists met to discuss…

    A Comparison of the Canadian and U.S. Healthcare Systems

    February 3, 2012

    The joys and the hazards of the Canadian single-payer universal healthcare program Canadian and the high-capacity and costly U.S. healthcare system.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences