In 2009, the ACR’s Committee on Rheumatologic Care (CORC) began its third Economic Benchmark Survey to update information from the previous surveys conducted in 1999 and 2003.
“The ACR’s primary purpose for this project was to ensure an adequate rheumatology workforce in an era of increased numbers of uninsured and underinsured [people] in the general population, increased [incidence of] chronic and musculoskeletal diseases, and an expanding population of aging citizens,” says Karen Kolba, MD, chair of CORC. There were four main objectives to this survey:
- Collect data and evaluate the work of rheumatologists in both academic settings and private practice;
- Identify the number of full-time equivalent physicians and nonphysician providers (such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners) needed to staff rheumatology practices to maintain the healthcare safety net;
- Collect physician and non-physician provider staffing and personnel data, including minimum and maximum staffing levels, average patient per adjusted hour, staffing levels, turnover rates among staffing categories, vacancy rates, time required to fill vacancies, on-call time, etc.; and
- Collect critical demographic information and characteristics, including information on those rheumatologists expected to close a practice in the near future, the age of the current workforce, likely number of years until retirement or transition to other employment, the number of rheumatologists working less than a full clinical schedule, training qualifications, etc.
To participate in the survey, members must have been currently full-time and actively practicing rheumatologists working in academia or private practice.
Key Results from the Survey
Research from the private practice area showed:
- There is a fairly even split between solo private (36%), single-specialty group (30%), and multi-specialty group (34%) practices. There are an average of five rheumatologists within the single-specialty group and four within the multi-specialty group.
- Five in 10 rheumatologists in private practice report all of their practice is adult rheumatology, while four in 10 report that 50% or more of their practice is adult rheumatology. A large majority reported zero primary care (80%) and pediatric rheumatology (70%).
- The majority of rheumatologists in private practice are compensated by their fee for services rendered. This is particularly true for single-physician clinics. Those practices that offer salary plus incentive bonus drive their bonus mainly off of productivity.
- Seventy-two percent of rheumatologists in private practice state that all personal sources of compensation come from direct patient care, with multi-specialty averaging the highest at almost 80%, followed by solo private practice at 78% and single specialty at 62%.
- Rheumatologists in private practice receive the majority of their revenue from Medicare and PPO/HMO insurance programs, regardless of the type of practice they are in.
Research from the academic area showed:
- Rheumatologists who view themselves primarily as a clinical teacher or clinical investigator see an average of 44 patients per week. Of those, 72% are established patients.
- More than one-third of rheumatologists practicing in academia report that their primary salary source is from clinical income, while one in five rheumatologists practicing in academia relies on grant support for their salary.
- Rheumatologists practicing in academia scheduled an average of 16 hours per week of clinic time. Additionally, one in four rheumatologists is in the clinic at least once a week; one in three is in the clinic at least two to three days per week; and nearly one-fourth are in the clinic four to six days per week.
- More than half of rheumatologists practicing in academia reported that they need about the same number of full-time equivalent rheumatologists. One in four reported they need more full-time equivalent rheumatologists, reporting an average of two needed.
In addition, more than half of rheumatologists practicing in both private practice and the academic setting reported a need for more full-time equivalent rheumatologists to meet the needs of Americans suffering from rheumatoid arthritis and other musculoskeletal disease.
Comparing the 2009 survey results to those of the 1999 and 2003 surveys showed significant changes.