Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

The ACR Responds to Impact of the Dobbs v. Jackson Decision on Rheumatology Patients and Providers

Joseph Cantrell, JD, & Kenneth G. Saag, MD, MSc  |  July 13, 2022

Prescription Access & Legal Challenges

Teratogenic drugs, specifically methotrexate, have faced particularly intense scrutiny. This is a particular problem because methotrexate is a first-line treatment for many rheumatic disease patients. Many payers and pharmacy benefit managers require patients to try methotrexate as a first step in their plan’s step therapy protocol; only after failing to respond to methotrexate can patients receive other therapies. Without access to methotrexate, patients with rheumatic diseases may be forced to pay for treatment out of their own pockets or be put on more expensive therapies, such as biologics; in some cases, they may be left with no treatment options covered by their insurer.

To monitor disruptions to methotrexate access, we are asking patients and members of the rheumatology care team to report access issues to the ACR at [email protected]. We are working closely with our partners at the Arthritis Foundation and other patient groups, with the Coalition of State Rheumatology Organizations and with other specialty societies to try to ascertain the scope of the disruptions patients are facing. Although we still do not know how widespread these problems are, it is clear that access problems do exist.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Even as access issues are an immediate concern, helping ACR members navigate what could be a legal minefield is also a top priority. Some states are moving at a rapid pace to certify trigger laws that could put patients and care professionals in legal jeopardy. At the same time, legal challenges are being mounted and injunctions have been issued in several states that prevent trigger laws from going into effect immediately. The legal landscape is rapidly evolving, and this evolution will continue for quite some time, which makes giving definitive answers at the moment all the more challenging.

Finally, it is important to point out the unique challenges the Dobbs decision poses for patients with rheumatic disease who are women, who are likely to bear the brunt of the unintended consequences that state abortion bans may have on the management of their conditions. Men are unlikely to encounter the same challenges as women when attempting to fill a prescription for methotrexate.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In states where abortion has been or will soon be criminalized, female patients with rheumatic disease should not be assumed guilty of trying to induce a medical abortion and forced to plead their innocence at the pharmacy counter when filling a prescription such as methotrexate.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:American College of RheumatologyConditionsLegislation & Advocacy Tagged with:Access to careAccess to Reproductive Health Care Task ForceACR advocacyLegalMethotrexatereproductive health

Related Articles

    In the Wake of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization

    May 10, 2023

    Since the Supreme Court ruling in June 2022 overturning 50 years of precedent protecting abortion as a constitutional right (Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization), states are enacting and implementing new laws to regulate abortion, and medical organizations and healthcare providers are assuming the large task of understanding what the new laws mean for their…

    Contraception, Abortion & Rheumatic Disease after Dobbs

    December 12, 2022

    PHILADELPHIA—As rheumatologists, we care for patients who may or may not want to become pregnant. We aren’t obstetricians or gynecologists, but several of the drugs we prescribe for active rheumatic disease can negatively affect pregnancy outcomes. It’s imperative we understand how to effectively counsel our patients with rheumatic disease on the risks and benefits of…

    Speak Out Rheum: To Prescribe Is Humane (Unless You’re In Texas)

    November 7, 2022

    You are a rheumatologist in Texas. You are very well trained. Your mentors included some of the leaders in rheumatology, and you are respected by your colleagues and your patients. You know the devastation of untreated rheumatoid arthritis and lupus. A young woman with recent onset of systemic lupus erythematosus is your new patient. You…

    Challenges in Reproductive Health in Rheumatic Disease

    July 11, 2022

    In light of new challenges to individuals’ reproductive rights and the known challenges of clinical management of rheumatic disease patients during pregnancy, we review the current state of reproductive rheumatology and the management of patients with rheumatic disease during pregnancy.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences