Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

The Future of SLE Treatment?

Ruth Jessen Hickman, MD  |  January 22, 2024

Example: All the patients with SLE have a SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score of 0 and are in remission. SLE-associated antibodies, such as anti-double stranded DNA, dropped to zero or near zero and have stayed there. Proteinuria disappeared, and complement C3 normalized.

Dr. Schett noted the muscle marker creatine kinase normalized in the myositis patients. In the systemic sclerosis patients, the European Scleroderma Trials and Research Group (EUSTAR) activity index and the modified Rodnan skin score both improved substantially.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“It seems you don’t end up in long-term B cell depletion from this therapy,” said Dr. Schett. He explained that CAR T therapy triggers initial rapid and sustained loss of circulating B cells, but B cells numbers bounce back about 50–100 days after the infusion.

“We thought maybe the lupus would come back when the B cells came back, but this didn’t happen,” Dr. Schett said. He speculated that part of the success of this response may have to do with the deeper depth of the initial depletion of B cells compared with an antibody-based approach with rituximab.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In terms of B cell lineage, this CD19-based CAR T cell therapy seems to only spare long-lived plasma cells, such as those residing in the bone marrow. In contrast, rituximab does not fully eliminate some B cells with autoimmune activation in the lymphatic tissue.6,7

Remaining long-lived plasma cells may play a role in SLE pathophysiology. Instead of CD19, some other trials of CAR T cell therapies in SLE are using BCMA-targeted antigens (i.e., B cell maturation antigen), which do kill long-lived plasma cells.11 However, the advantage of not eliminating such cells is that patients may maintain some immunity from before their treatment and may not require revaccination.2 In preliminary data, Dr. Schett shared that, after the B cells have reconstituted, patients’ antibodies from vaccinations they received before CAR T cell therapy seemed to be extremely stable (e.g., antibodies from measles, mumps, rubella and tetanus).

Toxicity is a major concern for CAR T cell therapy. Dr. Schett said the research team was concerned about the possibility of cytokine storm in their initial patients, but that did not occur. Also, the patients did not have other potential severe toxicities, such as neurotoxic effects or prolonged cytopenia.

Several patients with SLE are now two years post intervention, and many are at least one year out, Dr. Schett noted. More time is needed to see if these effects last and whether any long-term health risks emerge. However, the curative potential of these therapies—allowing total remission without the continued use of immunosuppressives—is compelling.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ACR ConvergenceConditionsMeeting ReportsSystemic Lupus ErythematosusSystemic Sclerosis Tagged with:ACR Convergence 2023CAR-T cell therapyT cell

Related Articles

    B Cell Depletion: The Latest Information on Disease Processes, Therapies

    January 25, 2021

    Experts discussed the latest knowledge on B cell disease processes, and what it might mean for future B cell depletion therapies.

    Targeting Disease-Causing Cells: RheumMadness 2022 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Scouting Report

    February 8, 2022

    CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies may have the potential to treat rheumatic diseases in which current therapeutic options are limited, such as lupus, interstitial lung disease and systemic sclerosis.

    T Cells in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

    August 1, 2011

    Progress toward targeted therapy

    Common Variable Immunodeficiency

    June 1, 2008

    Genetic insights into a complex and baffling disease

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences