The Rheumatologist
COVID-19 NewsACR Convergence
  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed
  • Home
  • Conditions
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • SLE (Lupus)
    • Crystal Arthritis
      • Gout Resource Center
    • Spondyloarthritis
    • Osteoarthritis
    • Soft Tissue Pain
    • Scleroderma
    • Vasculitis
    • Systemic Inflammatory Syndromes
    • Guidelines
  • Resource Centers
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis Resource Center
    • Gout Resource Center
    • Psoriatic Arthritis Resource Center
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
  • Drug Updates
    • Biologics & Biosimilars
    • DMARDs & Immunosuppressives
    • Topical Drugs
    • Analgesics
    • Safety
    • Pharma Co. News
  • Professional Topics
    • Ethics
    • Legal
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Career Development
      • Certification
      • Education & Training
    • Awards
    • Profiles
    • President’s Perspective
    • Rheuminations
    • Interprofessional Perspective
  • Practice Management
    • Billing/Coding
    • Quality Assurance/Improvement
    • Workforce
    • Facility
    • Patient Perspective
    • Electronic Health Records
    • Apps
    • Information Technology
    • From the College
    • Multimedia
      • Audio
      • Video
  • Resources
    • Issue Archives
    • ACR Convergence
      • Gout Resource Center
      • Axial Spondyloarthritis Resource Center
      • Psoriatic Arthritis
      • Abstracts
      • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence Home
    • American College of Rheumatology
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Research Reviews
    • ACR Journals
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
    • Rheumatology Image Library
    • Treatment Guidelines
    • Rheumatology Research Foundation
    • Events
  • About Us
    • Mission/Vision
    • Meet the Authors
    • Meet the Editors
    • Contribute to The Rheumatologist
    • Subscription
    • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Search
You are here: Home / Articles / The Role of ANA Positivity in Patients with RA

The Role of ANA Positivity in Patients with RA

September 28, 2021 • By Susan Bernstein

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version / Save PDF

“The rationale for ordering ANA [testing] is often to guide initial diagnosis and management. We thought, ‘Let’s take a look and see if there are any differences in how these patients are presenting at clinic,’” Dr. Paknikar says.

You Might Also Like
  • Study Finds ANA-Negative Classification Errors Among Newly Diagnosed Lupus Patients
  • EULAR 2015: Role of ACPA Positivity in Osteoarthritis
  • New Study Reveals Limitations in ANA Test Kits for Lupus
Also By This Author
  • Active Advocacy in the Sunshine State: Florida Society Presses for Legislative Changes to Protect Patient Access to Medications

Younger, Female, Non-Smoking

Within about 90 days of fulfillment of RA criteria, 161 (64%) of the 252 patients with RA in the study cohort were tested for ANA, and 25% were positive. The patients who were ANA positive tended to be women (20% vs. 37%; P=0.04); slightly younger, or a mean age of 51 years old vs. a mean of 55 years old (P=0.08); and less likely to currently smoke (5% vs. 17%; P=0.10). There were no differences in ANA positivity between patients who were seropositive or seronegative for RF or anti-CCP antibodies.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Patients who were seropositive for RF and ANA positive took a longer time to fulfill RA criteria, or a median of 16 days from their first joint swelling to fulfillment of the 1987 ACR Classification Criteria for RA, as opposed to a median of zero days for ANA-negative patients. ANA-positive patients also took a median of three days from their first sign of joint swelling to fulfill the 2010 ACR criteria, compared with zero days for ANA-negative patients.

Patients in both groups met the criteria in similar ways. Both groups had morning stiffness, rheumatoid nodules, joint erosions, and abnormal C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In the study, patients with ANA-positive RA also had a longer wait time before being offered treatment with a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), or a median of 41 days vs. 13 days (P=0.20). They were more likely to be treated with hydroxychloroquine as their first-line RA therapy than methotrexate (44% vs. 23%; P=0.03). Patients who were anti-CCP-antibody positive and ANA positive waited significantly longer to initiate DMARD therapy than those who were anti-CCP positive and ANA negative: 50 days instead of 10 (P=0.043). At five years, researchers did not find other differences, including differences in disease activity and mortality, between patients who were ANA positive and those who were ANA negative.

DMARD Choices Still Unclear

Although this new study’s results show some interesting differences between patients with ANA-positive and ANA-negative RA, it also raises questions about why these differences exist, says Dr. Paknikar.

“We have established how and when patients met the RA criteria, but not differences as far as their disease burden. There was increased time to the patients being offered their first DMARD, and they were more likely to be offered hydroxychloroquine, not methotrexate. Is that because of their ANA positivity? Or [was it due to] something we haven’t identified yet?” she says.

ad goes here:advert-3
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Conditions, Rheumatoid Arthritis Tagged With: ANA, ANA-positive RA, anti-nuclear antibody, RA Resource Center, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

You Might Also Like:
  • Study Finds ANA-Negative Classification Errors Among Newly Diagnosed Lupus Patients
  • EULAR 2015: Role of ACPA Positivity in Osteoarthritis
  • New Study Reveals Limitations in ANA Test Kits for Lupus
  • Ultrasound of Salivary Glands May Have Role in Diagnosing Sjogren’s

ACR Convergence

Don’t miss rheumatology’s premier scientific meeting for anyone involved in research or the delivery of rheumatologic care or services.

Visit the ACR Convergence site »

Meeting Abstracts

Browse and search abstracts from the ACR Convergence and ACR/ARP Annual Meetings going back to 2012.

Visit the Abstracts site »

American College of Rheumatology

Visit the official website for the American College of Rheumatology.

Visit the ACR »

The Rheumatologist newsmagazine reports on issues and trends in the management and treatment of rheumatic diseases. The Rheumatologist reaches 11,500 rheumatologists, internists, orthopedic surgeons, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who practice, research, or teach in the field of rheumatology.

About Us / Contact Us / Advertise / Privacy Policy / Terms of Use / Cookie Preferences

  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed

Copyright © 2006–2023 American College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

ISSN 1931-3268 (print)
ISSN 1931-3209 (online)