Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Tips, Resources to Help Rheumatologists Educate Patients on Biologics and Biosimilars

Vanessa Caceres  |  Issue: February 2017  |  February 15, 2017

In addition to answering the questions above, rheumatology providers also typically address what happens if biologics are not used properly—for example, what happens if patients still use a biologic while they have an infection (whether knowingly or not).

Patients may form inaccurate opinions about biologics, because when the medications are advertised direct to consumers, they include an exhaustive list of possible side effects and adverse reactions out of context. Many patients also do research on the Internet and gather information from both reliable and unreliable sources, says Adena Batterman, LCSW, clinical social worker and senior manager for Inflammatory Arthritis Support and Education Programs, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York. “That makes it more challenging to put these treatments and risk profiles in context,” she says.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Among all the questions and concerns, rheumatologists must make patients the copilot in the decision-making process to improve compliance, Dr. Field emphasizes.

Misuse Issues

Although rheumatologists are well versed in discussing biologics and patients take them seriously, misuse issues sometimes can occur.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Field has found out about patients in her practice who have administered self-injections while sick, changed the frequency of their injections and neglected to get timely lab studies and office follow-ups.

“We address potential misuse issues, particularly with self-injectable biologics, during the patient’s appointment, but it could always be improved or supported by more patient education,” she said.

Although Ms. Batterman has not seen specific misuses of biologics, she has spoken with patients who were not well-informed about inflammatory arthritis as a systemic illness or the rationale for the use of biologics.

“I have worked with patients who did not understand that biologics treat a progressive systemic illness,” she says. “Instead, some patients can be under the assumption that if they can tolerate the joint pain and some other symptoms they experience, then they can delay or do without treatment with a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug [DMARD] or biologic.”

Dr. Troum has had patients tell him that they took their biologic when they had an infection because no one told them not to do so. Although the latter may not be true, it brings home the point of reinforcing the potential for misuse, he says.

A 2016 study of 677 French patients with inflammatory arthritis found that certain factors were associated with lower self-care skills associated with biologics.1 Led by Anne-Christine Rat, MD, Lorraine University, Nancy, France, patients who lived alone, had a lower educational level, lived in a large city, were unemployed and did not receive written information had lower safety skills associated with the use of biological DMARDs.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsDrug UpdatesPractice Support Tagged with:Association of Rheumatology Professionals (ARP)BiologicsDrugspatient carePractice ManagementQualityrheumatologistrheumatologySafetytherapyTreatment

Related Articles

    Marching to the Biosimilar Beat: Questions on Rollout Remain

    September 7, 2023

    The availability of biosimilars for the treatment of patients with rheumatic diseases exploded in 2023. Here’s where we stand and what to expect going forward.

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    April 15, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

    The Biosimilars Debate Heats Up: Potential cost savings weighed against patient health & safety

    March 1, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

    Possible Impact of Biosimilar Infliximab on U.S. Market in Prescriptions, Pricing

    September 8, 2016

    The use of biosimilars for rheuma­tology in the U.S. became a reality when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb), a biosimilar to Remicade (infliximab), in April. What this may mean is increased competition among drug companies with regard to pricing and, therefore, potentially lower costs for U.S. patients, according to Seoyoung…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences