Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Trends in the Use of DMARDs for Patients with JIA

Arthritis & Rheumatology  |  April 8, 2025

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common pediatric rheumatic disease, and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are the most effective treatments for JIA and JIA-associated uveitis. These treatments include conventional synthetic DMARDs, such as methotrexate; biologic DMARDs, such as etanercept, adalimumab and tocilizumab; and targeted synthetic DMARDs, such as tofacitinib and baricitinib.

In an effort to identify and describe trends in prescribing practices for pediatric patients with JIA, Yalamanchili et al. evaluated the use of DMARDs over the past two decades among commercially insured children with JIA aged 1 to 18 years.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Methods

This serial, cross-sectional utilization study examined patient data from 2000 to 2022. The researchers identified initiations of conventional synthetic DMARDs, biologic DMARDs and targeted synthetic DMARDs after a ≥12-month baseline. These data were expressed as a percentage of all new DMARD initiations per year, by category, class and agent. Trends were evaluated using linear regression.

They also examined the first biologic DMARDs and targeted synthetic DMARDs initiated after conventional synthetic DMARD monotherapy.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The Results

The study identified 20,258 episodes of new DMARD use among 13,696 patients with a median age 14 years (67.5% female).

Although conventional synthetic DMARDs were the most used treatment overall, their use declined from 89.5% of new use episodes to 43.2% over the study period (P<0.001 for trend). Meanwhile, biologic DMARD use increased (10.5–50%, P<0.001) over the study period.

Data on tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors showed that the new use of etanercept peaked at 28.3% in 2006 and declined to 4.2% in 2022 (P=0.002). Adalimumab use doubled (7–14% from 2007–2008) after its approval as a JIA treatment. It’s use continued to increase after a less painful formulation was released (20.5% in 2022, P<0.001). Overall, the study showed that TNF inhibitor use has declined.

Additionally, study data showed an increase in the use of other biologic DMARDs and targeted synthetic DMARDs, particularly ustekinumab, secukinumab and tofacitinib. In 2022, adalimumab was the most common first-initiated, biologic/targeted synthetic DMARD in patients after trying a conventional synthetic DMARD (77.8%).

Conclusion

For commercially insured patient in the U.S., patterns in new DMARD use for JIA have evolved due to multiple factors, including regulatory approvals and tolerability. Overall, the study demonstrated that from 2000 to 2022 in this patient population the use of biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs has risen and the use of conventional synthetic DMARDs has declined.

For complete details, including source material, refer to the full study.   


Excerpted and adapted from:

Yalamanchili P, Lee LY, Bushnell G, et al. Trends in new use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for juvenile idiopathic arthritis among commercially insured children in the United States from 2001 to 2022. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025 Apr;77(4):468–476.

Page: 1 2 | Multi-Page
Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsConditionsDrug UpdatesPediatric Conditions Tagged with:adalimumabDisease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)JIAjuvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)prescribingtrends

Related Articles
    Oksana Kuzmina/shutterstock.comx

    Environmental Factors in Pediatric Systemic Autoimmune Diseases

    March 20, 2017

    Systemic autoimmune diseases are thought to result from immune dysregulation in genetically susceptible individuals who were exposed to environmental risk factors. Many studies have identified genetic risk factors for these diseases, but concordance rates among monozygotic twins are 25–40%, suggesting that nonheritable environmental factors play a more prominent role.1,2 Through carefully conducted epidemiologic and other…

    What Adult Rheumatologists Need to Know about Juvenile Arthritis

    May 1, 2013

    How to recognize distinctions between pediatric and adult arthritis

    A Novel Study Compared the Effectiveness of Adalimumab with Tofacitinib in RA

    August 17, 2023

    Your patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) isn’t responding well enough to methotrexate, and you both agree it’s time to consider a biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). But which one should you choose? ad goes here:advert-1ADVERTISEMENTSCROLL TO CONTINUEIn a treat-to-target era, we’re fortunate to have a variety of RA therapies at our disposal….

    A Possible Diagnostic Tool: RheumMadness 2022 AI: JIA Subtypes Scouting Report

    February 14, 2022

    Machine learning is a tool that may help pediatric rheumatologists distinguish between different subtypes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and predict treatment response.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences