Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

U.S. House Panel Spotlights Use of FDA Rules to Slow Generic Drugs

Diane Bartz  |  July 28, 2017

WASHINGTON (Reuters)—Republican and Democratic lawmakers on Thursday discussed ways to prevent drugmakers from using rules developed to safeguard patients to instead block the sale of cheaper medicines.

The focus at a hearing, held by members of the House Judiciary Committee’s antitrust subcommittee, was on the use by some brand name drug companies of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) program, called Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS), to protect their pharmaceuticals from generic competition.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Under the FDA program, generic companies often must buy samples of a drug they want to copy from the brand name company that makes the drug, rather than a wholesaler.

Drugmakers have been accused of refusing to make such sales, and the House and Senate are both considering legislation that would allow generic drug companies to sue to demand samples.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The legislation under consideration would also provide for damages for generic companies denied access to brand name drugs.

Lawmakers from both parties expressed discomfort with the practice of blocking cheaper drugs from getting to market. Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), the Judiciary Committee’s top Democrat, asked how he could help to stop it.

High and rising drug prices have proved a pain point for many voters, particularly those without insurance or on tight budgets. Drug companies argue that they need the high prices to fund multibillion-dollar research to discover the next life-saving medicine.

Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), the Judiciary Committee’s chairman, noted voter concerns about the high price of some medicines.

“While it is imperative that the U.S. continue to remain the world leader and innovator in the pharmaceutical market, it is important that … antitrust concerns be given significant deliberation,” he said.

Scott Gottlieb, an FDA commissioner, testified that drug companies sometimes “game” the government system.

Markus Meier, acting head of competition for the Federal Trade Commission, said any delay in the rollout of generic drugs has clear consequences.

“When drug companies can succeed in delaying generic entry, American consumers will pay higher prices for prescription drugs,” he said.

Under the FDA’s REMS program, 71 drugs are covered by varying levels of protection. In some of the most strict cases, the drugs can only be given to a patient on a registry or dispensed in a particular healthcare setting, like a clinic.

Drugs with REMS include Indivior’s Suboxone (buprenorphine/naloxone), Sanofi Genzyme’s Lemtrada (alemtuzumab) and Danco Laboratories’ Mifeprex (mifepristone).

Share: 

Filed under:Drug Updates Tagged with:FDAFood and Drug Administrationgeneric drugmakersgeneric drugsgeneric pharmaceutical companiesREMSRisk Evaluation and Mitigation StrategyU.S. Food and Drug Administration

Related Articles

    REMS Required

    August 1, 2009

    How will this FDA drug safety program affect rheumatology offices?

    Generic-Drug Price Fixing: Is It Happening?

    May 17, 2018

    It started with an inhaler. Like many of you, I am a rheuma­tologist. And like you, I see some patients more often their own primary care provider. This is so often the case that I have gradually devolved into their backup, all-purpose doctor. I am the doc they notify when they get hospitalized for pneumonia…

    Beware Antitrust Laws When Considering Healthcare Mergers

    March 1, 2015

    Analysis of laws governing collaboration of healthcare systems, hospitals and physician practices should be done before consolidating

    FDA Issues Stronger Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) Warning

    October 14, 2015

    Image Credit: ajt/shutterstock.com The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has toughened the existing warnings for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) due to their stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) risk increase.1 Due to a continual review of these products, FDA is requiring label updates for all prescription NSAIDs. Over-the-counter (OTC) NSAIDs already list the increased risk…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences