The Rheumatologist
  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed
  • Home
  • Conditions
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • SLE (Lupus)
    • Crystal Arthritis
    • Spondyloarthritis
    • Osteoarthritis
    • Soft Tissue Pain
    • Scleroderma
    • Vasculitis
    • Systemic Inflammatory Syndromes
    • Guidelines
  • Drug Updates
    • Biologics & Biosimilars
    • DMARDs & Immunosuppressives
    • Topical Drugs
    • Analgesics
    • Safety
    • Pharma Co. News
  • Professional Topics
    • Ethics
    • Legal
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Career Development
      • Certification
      • Education & Training
    • Awards
    • Profiles
    • President’s Perspective
    • Rheuminations
  • Practice Management
    • Billing/Coding
    • Quality Assurance/Improvement
    • Workforce
    • Facility
    • Patient Perspective
  • Technology
    • Electronic Health Records
    • Apps
    • Information Technology
  • Resources
    • Issue Archives
    • Events
    • Multimedia
      • Audio
      • Video
    • From the College
    • American College of Rheumatology
    • Rheumatology Research Foundation
    • Arthritis & Rheumatology
    • Arthritis Care & Research
    • Treatment Guidelines
    • Research Reviews
    • Annual Meeting
      • Abstracts
      • Meeting Reports
    • Rheumatology Image Bank
    • ACR ExamRheum
  • About Us
    • Mission/Vision
    • Meet the Authors
    • Meet the Editors
    • Contribute to The Rheumatologist
    • Subscription
    • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Search
You are here: Home / Articles / U.S. Telehealth Industry Eyes Medicare for Its Next Big Check

U.S. Telehealth Industry Eyes Medicare for Its Next Big Check

January 30, 2018 • By Tamara Mathias

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version / Save PDF

(Reuters)—After years of lobbying in Washington, U.S. telehealth providers have the first hints that the dam could break on public funding for an industry they say could save taxpayers billions.

You Might Also Like
  • Telehealth Visits May Be an Option After Surgery
  • Telehealth Extends Rheumatologists’ Reach
  • Medicare Telemedicine Underuse May Not Be Due to Reimbursement Policies

Four bills that could be signed into law over the next year carry the solutions to barriers that have prevented the U.S.s’ huge over-65 health program Medicare from reimbursing doctors’ and medical visits, which often start over the phone.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The bills come at a time when the industry’s claims of cost savings—powered by apps and mass smartphone usage—have begun to gain traction with private insurers striving to save on healthcare costs.

One issue for public spending on telehealth has been the inability to charge across state lines. Another is that Medicare does not recognize medical consultations that do not happen in person as the equivalent of a visit to the doctor.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The fate of legislative amendments that unlock these barriers is far from clear in a fractured U.S. Congress, but investors and some of the world’s big healthcare providers are already circling firms like the U.S. sector’s dominant player Teladoc Inc.

Analysts say Teladoc racked up 75% of reported video or phone visits, according to 2016 estimates, but European insurance company Allianz Group earlier this month committed $59 million to American Well, one of a handful of smaller privately-run operations expanding in the sector.

Apple Inc.’s Heart Study app, which flags irregular heart rhythms in users wearing Apple Watches, allows them to instantly connect with a doctor using American Well’s technology.

ad goes here:advert-3
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

American Well Chief Executive Roy Schoenberg says that although revenue is steadily rising in the industry, it could grow 10-fold if payment parity, state-line and location-based constraints were lifted.

“There is a big black line between the availability of telehealth services to Americans under the age of 65 and Americans that are above the age of 65,” Schoenberg says. “This [legislation] would be an earthquake.”

Telehealth Costs Savings
Private insurers who cover the medical expenses of nearly 70% of U.S. adults aged 18–64 are attracted by costs that analysts say are at most a third of traditional face-to-face care.

Cowen and Co analyst Charles Rhyee estimates the average cost of a telehealth call is between $40–50 compared with around $150 for an urgent care visit—and nearly $1,500 for a trip to the emergency department.

Rhyee also estimates that roughly $135 billion of Medicare’s annual $675 billion in spending could be done by telehealth.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Technology Tagged With: apps, Medicare, Technology, telehealth, telemedicine

You Might Also Like:
  • Telehealth Visits May Be an Option After Surgery
  • Telehealth Extends Rheumatologists’ Reach
  • Medicare Telemedicine Underuse May Not Be Due to Reimbursement Policies
  • Telehealth Is Helping the Underserved

Rheumatology Research Foundation

The Foundation is the largest private funding source for rheumatology research and training in the U.S.

Learn more »

ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Don’t miss rheumatology’s premier scientific meeting for anyone involved in research or the delivery of rheumatologic care or services.

Visit the ACR Annual Meeting site »

ACR/ARP Meeting Abstracts

Browse and search abstracts from the ACR/ARP Annual Meetings going back to 2012.

Visit the ACR/ARP Meeting Abstracts site »

The Rheumatologist newsmagazine reports on issues and trends in the management and treatment of rheumatic diseases. The Rheumatologist reaches 11,500 rheumatologists, internists, orthopedic surgeons, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who practice, research, or teach in the field of rheumatology.

About Us / Contact Us / Advertise / Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed

Copyright © 2006–2019 American College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

ISSN 1931-3268 (print)
ISSN 1931-3209 (online)

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.