Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Upadacitinib + Methotrexate & Other csDMARDs in RA Patients

Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP  |  July 12, 2019

MADRID—The selective JAK1 inhibitor upadacitinib has proved effective for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when used in combination with methotrexate or other conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). In a recent analysis of two phase 3 studies, the efficacy of upadacitinib plus methotrexate was directly compared with upadacitinib plus other csDMARDs in RA patients who had an inadequate response to csDMARDs (SELECT-NEXT study) or biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) (SELECT-BEYOND study). The results of the analysis were presented during the 2019 European Congress of Rheumatology (EULAR), June 12–15. 1

Patients received either 15 mg or 30 mg of upadacitinib or placebo once daily for 12 weeks, along with csDMARDs. There were 661 patients in SELECT-NEXT and 498 patients in SELECT-BEYOND. In both studies, the primary endpoints were the rates of ACR20 response and Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) ≤3.2. Other endpoints included: DAS28-CRP <2.6, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) low disease activity (≤10) and CDAI remission (≤2.8).

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Patients were grouped on the basis of concomitant csDMARD use, either with methotrexate or with non-methotrexate csDMARDs. Non-methotrexate csDMARDs included sulfasalazine, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine. Patients who received both methotrexate and a non-methotrexate csDMARD were included in the methotrexate group. The demographics and disease characteristics of both treatment groups were similar. Most patients were white females, and about half were also using oral corticosteroids at baseline.=

In SELECT-NEXT, 535 patients received methotrexate and 124 patients received non-methotrexate csDMARDS. In SELECT-BEYOND, 410 patients received concomitant methotrexate, while 82 patients received non-methotrexate csDMARDs.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

All upadacitinib-treated patients achieved higher efficacy outcomes than placebo-treated patients, with no significant differences between efficacy outcomes in either upadacitinib-treated group. This post-hoc analysis of upadacitinib-treated patients showed efficacy of the agent whether it is used in combination with methotrexate or non-methotrexate csDMARDs.


Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP, is a freelance medical writer based in New York City and a pharmacist at New York Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital.

Reference

  1. Kremer J, van den Bosch F, Rubbert-Roth A, et al. A comparison of upadacitinib plus methotrexate and upadacitinib plus other csDMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: An analysis of two phase 3 studies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun. 78(suppl 2):A749.

Share: 

Filed under:Drug UpdatesEULAR/OtherMeeting Reports Tagged with:combination therapyEULARMethotrexateRheumatoid Arthritis (RA)upadacitinib

Related Articles
    ajt/shutterstock.com

    FDA Approves Upadacitinib for Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

    October 27, 2022

    The FDA has approved upadacitinib for the treatment of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) based on a short-term study that demonstrated improved pain, function and other symptoms of nr-axSpA in patients with active disease.

    Health Canada Approves Upadacitinib to Treat Adults with PsA

    July 6, 2021

    Based on data from two phase 3 clinical trials, Health Canada has approved the use of upadacitinib to treat adults with active psoriatic arthritis.

    Trial Pits Upadacitinib vs. Adalimumab for Psoriatic Arthritis

    October 14, 2021

    As treatments for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) emerge, a clinical trial comparing the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor upadacitinib and the tumor necrosis fac­tor (TNF) inhibitor adalimumab provided some new insights. Published earlier this year in The New England Journal of Medi­cine, the SELECT-PsA 1, double-blind, phase 3 trial found that a 30 mg dose of upadacitinib…

    Upadacitnib for RA: Researchers Compared Upadacitinib with Placebo & Adalimumab in Patients with RA & an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

    March 9, 2021

    In phase 3 clinical trial, upadacitnib proved superior to placebo and adalimumab in improving the signs and symptoms of RA in patients on stable background methotrexate.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences