Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Upadacitnib for RA: Researchers Compared Upadacitinib with Placebo & Adalimumab in Patients with RA & an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate

Vanessa Caceres  |  Issue: March 2021  |  March 9, 2021

The long-term safety assessments from upadacitinib’s phase 3 RA program will help better characterize rare safety events with the drug, write the authors.

According to the authors, one limitation of the study is that the duration of the placebo-controlled period was 26 weeks, with rescue treatment administered at week 14. “[Because] rescue treatment was provided starting at week 14 for ethical reasons, not all patients remained on their randomized treatment assignment for the entire six months,” they write.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

A Closer Look
Because upadacitinib is newly available—the third jakinib approved for RA—it’s important for rheumatologists to reflect on the results of studies like this one.

The study’s evidence that upadacitinib is as effective as adalimumab to treat RA is notable, says study author Roy Fleischmann, MD, MACR, co-medical director, Metroplex Clinical Research Center, and clinical professor of medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas. “This is the third agent in the [jakinib] class that has been shown to be at least as effective—if not more so—[as] a bDMARD,” he says.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The similar adverse events seen in both the upadacitinib and adalimumab patients was an interesting result. “This riskbenefit profile raises the question, [because jakinibs] are oral, whether they should be used prior to a bDMARD in a methotrexate incomplete responder,” Dr. Fleischmann says.

Because of the concern with VTEs occurring in jakinib-treated patients, Elena Schiopu, MD, associate professor, Division of Rheumatology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, is more diligent about monitoring for additional risk factors associated with VTEs, such as obesity, estrogen use, history of malignancies and immobility. However, the major risk factors are prior VTEs and use of a COX2 inhibitor. Like tofacitinib and baricitinib, upadacitinib has a boxed warning about VTEs on its label.


Vanessa Caceres is a medical writer in Bradenton, Fla.

Reference

  1. Fleischmann R, Pangan AL, Song I-H, et al. Upadacitinib vs. placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: Results of a phase 3, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Nov;71(11): 1788–1800. Epub 2019 Aug 28.

 

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ACR ConvergenceDrug UpdatesMeeting Reports Tagged with:ACR Convergence 2020ACR Convergence 2020 – RAadalimumabjakinibupadacitinib

Related Articles

    Trial Pits Upadacitinib vs. Adalimumab for Psoriatic Arthritis

    October 14, 2021

    As treatments for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) emerge, a clinical trial comparing the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor upadacitinib and the tumor necrosis fac­tor (TNF) inhibitor adalimumab provided some new insights. Published earlier this year in The New England Journal of Medi­cine, the SELECT-PsA 1, double-blind, phase 3 trial found that a 30 mg dose of upadacitinib…

    Psoriatic Arthritis: Advances in Therapeutics, Imaging & More Presented at ACR Convergence 2022

    December 1, 2022

    PHILADELPHIA—Selecting my top 10 picks for abstracts in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) at the ACR Convergence 2022 meeting was not easy because there was a great deal to review and learn from the 139 abstracts submitted to the meeting. I focused first and foremost on advances in therapeutics that encompassed both new and approved therapeutics, novel…

    ajt/shutterstock.com

    FDA Approves Upadacitinib for Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

    October 27, 2022

    The FDA has approved upadacitinib for the treatment of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) based on a short-term study that demonstrated improved pain, function and other symptoms of nr-axSpA in patients with active disease.

    Health Canada Approves Upadacitinib to Treat Adults with PsA

    July 6, 2021

    Based on data from two phase 3 clinical trials, Health Canada has approved the use of upadacitinib to treat adults with active psoriatic arthritis.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences