Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Using the 2019 EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria to Predict Disease Severity in SLE

Lara C. Pullen, PhD  |  November 30, 2021

Although systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has an unpredictable disease course, rheumatologists recognize that persistent disease activity and flares may predict joint and organ damage and mortality.

Ominosity

A 2021 study found a score of 20 or more on the 2019 EULAR/ACR SLE Classification Criteria can predict ominosity—or the likelihood of a more severe disease course—in patients with SLE. Senior investigator Sindhu R. Johnson, MD, PhD, associate professor in the Division of Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Canada, was co-chair of the 12-member 2019 EULAR/ACR SLE Classification Criteria steering committee.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In the study, Dr. Johnson and her colleagues sought to determine the possible link between the new EULAR/ACR SLE scores at diagnosis and subsequent disease severity. They found patients with a score of 20 or more had a more active disease course throughout the first five years than did those with a score less than 20 (P<0.001). Their findings were published in the Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, and the researchers concluded the new criteria provide prognostic information about the severity of lupus in the first five years after diagnosis.3

New Tool for Patient Stratification

“There are no special tools or up-front methods to determine which population will have a worse disease course,” says first author Laura P. Whittall Garcia, MD, a clinical research fellow studying SLE at Toronto Western Hospital.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

According to Dr. Garcia, although rheumatologists recognize that patients with lupus nephritis may have a worse disease course than those without nephritis, the new results are surprising because they apply to patients without lupus nephritis. All patients with an EULAR/ACR SLE score of 20 or more had a more ominous disease course than those with a score of less than 20. Dr. Johnson adds their findings indicate that these classification criteria both classify and prognosticate, suggesting they may be a new tool for patient stratification. She believes the criteria can help rheumatologists know which patients should be more closely followed in clinical practice.

The study involved an inception cohort of 875 patients, and the researchers followed 86.6% for at least one year, 76% for three years and 65.6% for five years. When the researchers applied the 2019 EULAR/ACR SLE Classification Criteria, they found, at diagnosis, 1.8% had a score of less than 10 and approximately half had a score of 20 or more. The scores had a normal distribution curve over a mean of 20.5. The three most common clinical domains of the EULAR/ACR SLE criteria documented in the study cohort were joint involvement, acute cutaneous lupus and non-scarring alopecia.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Tagged with:Classification CriteriaSLEsystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

Related Articles

    TNF Blockade for SLE

    September 1, 2010

    Reckless approach versus missed opportunity?

    2019 EULAR/ACR SLE Classification Criteria Offer Improved Sensitivity & Specificity

    November 6, 2019

    The new EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE offer improved sensitivity and specificity, as well as more accurately reflect the current tests used to clinically diagnose SLE. A positive ANA test is obligatory…

    New Classification Criteria for SLE: Proposed ACR/EULAR Criteria aim for high sensitivity & specificity

    December 15, 2017

    SAN DIEGO—The proposed classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), supported but not yet approved by the ACR and EULAR, were debuted on Nov. 7 at the 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting. An international steering committee developed and validated the criteria, with patient input and the consensus of more than 150 global SLE experts. Rheumatology researchers…

    Lupus often presents with a butterfly rash.

    Top 12: Research in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus at a Glance

    November 18, 2021

    Dr. Pisetsky’s picks for the top research in lupus presented at ACR Convergence 2021.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences