Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

What Do Your Patients Think About You?

Kathleen Louden  |  Issue: May 2012  |  May 9, 2012

Use of patient-satisfaction surveys reportedly has been increasing among health systems and medical practices, but are many rheumatologists conducting them?

No nationwide data seem to be available, but less than 50% of members of the Mississippi Arthritis and Rheumatism Society reported in January that they conduct patient-satisfaction surveys, according to the society’s immediate past president, Charles M. King II, MD. In his state, rheumatologists affiliated with large health systems appeared to be more likely than small practices to use patient-satisfaction tools.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. King, a private-practice rheumatologist with North Mississippi Health Services in Tupelo, Miss., says his large health system evaluates patient satisfaction monthly and that such surveys are a crucial part of practice-improvement processes.

“We are in a healthcare environment that demands quality,” says Dr. King, chair of the ACR Committee on Rheumatologic Care (CORC). “But we also have to pay attention to customer satisfaction.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Benefits of Surveys

As the healthcare market becomes more consumer driven, practices that show they care about patient satisfaction will have a competitive advantage, experts say.

“Anyone who ignores patient-satisfaction surveys, I think, is not going to have a thriving practice for long,” says Eric S. Schned, MD, a clinical rheumatologist with Park Nicollet Clinic in Minneapolis.

Dr. Schned
Dr. Schned

If your rheumatology practice is not using patient-satisfaction surveys, consider the evidence supporting their use.

High ratings on patient-satisfaction surveys have been linked to benefits for medical practices ranging from reduced patient turnover to lower malpractice risk.1-2 More recently, a survey conducted by the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) in Englewood, Colo., shows that formally evaluating patients’ experiences may relate to higher revenues. More than 60% of 549 “better-performing” medical practices use patient-satisfaction surveys to assess and improve operations, the 2011 MGMA survey finds.3

Many private healthcare organizations already are using patient-satisfaction scores for physician compensation such as bonuses. If you accept Medicare patients, evaluating your patients’ experiences may even become a requirement. Experts anticipate that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will tie measurement of patient experience to a pay formula for physicians within the next few years.4

Furthermore, the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) is considering when to add a patient-survey requirement to its maintenance of certification (MOC) program, as it is a requirement of the American Board of Medical Specialties, says ABIM spokeswoman Lorie B. Slass. However, she notes that patient surveys are already a part of some of the ABIM’s Practice Improvement Modules for MOC.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice SupportQuality Assurance/Improvement Tagged with:drugMedicarepatient satisfactionpatient surveysPractice ManagementQualityrheumatologist

Related Articles

    How Non-Physician Providers Can Help Your Practice

    November 17, 2017

    New data shows that both private and public rheumatology practices benefit financially by hiring non-physician providers (NPPs). But when should practices hire NPPs?

    Rheumatology & The Gender Pay Gap

    September 8, 2017

    On average, male rheumatologists earn 16.2%—or $38,493—more than female rheumatologists. Although the data seem jarring, a closer look at it is needed to truly understand the pay gap…

    Patient Satisfaction Scores—Do They Matter?

    April 26, 2018

    You see a patient for the first time to establish care for Sjögren’s disease. She complains of dry eyes, dry mouth and diffuse arthralgias. You do not appreciate any synovitis on physical exam. Of note, you are the fourth rheumatologist she has seen during the past year. Toward the end of the clinic visit, she…

    Speak Out Rheum: Are Independent Measures of Patient Satisfaction Reliable?

    May 1, 2014

    Patient survey questionnaires, metrics to gauge physician performance may not be trustworthy indicators of quality of patient care

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences