Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

What Do Your Patients Think About You?

Kathleen Louden  |  Issue: May 2012  |  May 9, 2012

Aside from possible future requirements, patient-satisfaction surveys give practitioners valuable information about the patient’s overall experience, including nontechnical dimensions of care.

Elizabeth Woodcock, MBA

It used to be that surveys were a pretty laborious effort, but the surveying process has gotten a lot easier.

—Elizabeth Woodcock, MBA

“Achieving a clinical benchmark, such as giving a DMARD [disease-modifying antirheumatic drug] to a patient with rheumatoid arthritis, doesn’t necessarily translate into a pleasant experience for the patient,” says Raymond S. Hong, MD, MBA, a rheumatologist with Kaiser Permanente Ohio Region in Parma, Ohio, and an ACR CORC member.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Because a patient-satisfaction questionnaire implies that the medical practice is interested in doing things better, patients will assume change will follow. Thus, before undertaking a patient satisfaction survey, you need to be motivated to change, says Kenneth T. Hertz, an Alexandria, La.-based principal with MGMA Health Care Consulting Group.

Do It Yourself?

A major decision in launching a patient-satisfaction survey is whether your practice will create and disseminate the survey or hire a consultant or company to handle it.

Advantages of an outside agency are experience, time savings for the medical practice, and guaranteed anonymity for respondents. In addition, many survey vendors provide clients with reports that track results over time and that benchmark their satisfaction scores against other providers.

“Unless your budget is constrained, I think it’s better to use an outside vendor that is experienced in doing surveys,” Dr. King says.

On the other hand, rheumatology practices considering developing their own patient survey should not be intimidated, says Elizabeth Woodcock, MBA, a healthcare consultant and trainer with Woodcock & Associates in Atlanta.

“It used to be that surveys were a pretty laborious effort, but the surveying process has gotten a lot easier,” says Woodcock, who also is the author of the book Front Office Success—How to Satisfy Patients and Boost the Bottom Line (MGMA, 2010).

Electronic surveys, she says, offer an easier option than mail-based surveys. Also, free survey templates are available online.

Distribution Decisions

Woodcock believes it is best to integrate measurement of patient satisfaction into the workflow. A stand-alone computer in the front office, or even a portable media device such as a tablet computer or iPad, can serve as the survey delivery system. Woodcock suggests stationing the device at the checkout point, with the touchscreen facing the patient.

Another option is a drop box located in the checkout area for completed print surveys. Surveys can be handed out after the physician visit to every patient or to a random number, such as every third patient.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice SupportQuality Assurance/Improvement Tagged with:drugMedicarepatient satisfactionpatient surveysPractice ManagementQualityrheumatologist

Related Articles

    How Non-Physician Providers Can Help Your Practice

    November 17, 2017

    New data shows that both private and public rheumatology practices benefit financially by hiring non-physician providers (NPPs). But when should practices hire NPPs?

    Rheumatology & The Gender Pay Gap

    September 8, 2017

    On average, male rheumatologists earn 16.2%—or $38,493—more than female rheumatologists. Although the data seem jarring, a closer look at it is needed to truly understand the pay gap…

    Patient Satisfaction Scores—Do They Matter?

    April 26, 2018

    You see a patient for the first time to establish care for Sjögren’s disease. She complains of dry eyes, dry mouth and diffuse arthralgias. You do not appreciate any synovitis on physical exam. Of note, you are the fourth rheumatologist she has seen during the past year. Toward the end of the clinic visit, she…

    Speak Out Rheum: Are Independent Measures of Patient Satisfaction Reliable?

    May 1, 2014

    Patient survey questionnaires, metrics to gauge physician performance may not be trustworthy indicators of quality of patient care

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences