Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

What the Physician Payment Sunshine Act & Open Payments Database Mean in Practice

E. William St.Clair, MD  |  Issue: January 2015  |  January 1, 2015

Shining light on the Sunshine Act & Open Payments Database

Where were you Sept. 30, 2014?

By now you are all well aware of Section 6002 of the Affordable Care Act, which lays out the regulations of the Physician Payment Sunshine Act. Over a period of five months, August through December 2013, applicable manufacturers were tracking and reporting certain transfers of value made to U.S. physicians. As you may recall, you had the opportunity to review and dispute any erroneous reporting in August 2014. But where were you on Sept. 30, 2014? Were you online, scrutinizing the CMS Open Payments Database? If so, like many of your colleagues, you were likely disappointed by the lack of transparency in these government efforts to promote, well…transparency.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

If you have visited the Open Payments site lately, you may have been equally as frustrated as the general public and media in navigating the site due to multiple unwieldy databases and significant limitations in search functionality. To further exasperate users, it’s not possible on the website to carry out queries, such as calculating the amount of money paid to institutions for a particular drug or comparing transfers of value from different companies. These deficiencies are just a few of the challenges of the system. CMS, however, has reassured all stakeholders that upgrades to this system are being made to enhance its overall performance.

In response to concerns about conveying potentially misleading information (at least in its current format), CMS felt compelled to remind the public that, “Just because there are financial ties doesn’t mean that anyone is doing anything wrong.” They stated, “Transparency will shed light on the nature and extent of these financial relationships and will hopefully discourage the development of inappropriate relationships.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Although the intent is well-meaning, there are nuances to these data that may not be generally understood by those outside of healthcare.

Table 1: 10 Manufacturers That Spent the Most on Research
click for large version
Table 1: 10 Manufacturers That Spent the Most on Research

Some Notes on the Data

Once the data were crunched by various stakeholders, it was determined that research payments from manufacturers to teaching hospitals and physicians equaled close to $1.5 billion. Although this total is an eye-catching number, part of this amount comes from the value of donated drugs intended for use by patients and does not represent direct monetary value to physician investigators. Will the general public and the media look only at the totals and derive their conclusions without drilling deeper into the data?

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Legislation & AdvocacyPresident's Perspective Tagged with:Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)continuing medical educationopen paymentphysicianSt.ClairSunshine Act

Related Articles

    President’s Perspective: Will the Physician Payment Sunshine Act Shed Light on Conflicts of Interest?

    July 1, 2013

    What rheumatologists should know about complying with the PPSA when it goes into effect on August 1

    What Rheumatologists Need to Know About the Physician Payment Sunshine Act

    July 1, 2013

    The federal act mandates transparency within physician–industry relationship

    No Easy Solution for Lack of Transparency in the Practice of Medicine

    December 1, 2012

    Several well-publicized episodes highlight the apparent lack of disclosure of conflicts of interest in medicine, but will disclosure laws fix the problem or add to the confusion?

    Cost of a Free Lunch

    May 1, 2007

    Much is made of pharma’s influence on CME—but do we really know what this educational funding buys?

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences