Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Why Tweaking Molecular Structures Can Be Hazardous to Our Health

Simon M. Helfgott, MD  |  Issue: June 2014  |  June 1, 2014

The selective theory of COX inhibition took hold of us. We were smitten. Because COX enzymes were found in just about every human tissue, these drugs were studied in myriad diseases. Although they failed to slow the progression of Alzheimer’s disease, they showed efficacy in preventing the development of certain forms of inherited adenomatous polyps that required COX-2 to grow. Every major pharmaceutical company had similar drugs in their development pipelines. This was supposed to be the dawning of a new era.

Dawn Fades to Dusk

Perhaps we should not have been astonished to see how quickly dawn faded to dusk. After all, it was long known that aspirin use provided significant antithrombotic effects. For example, one of the first anticoagulants, dicumarol, was found to spontaneously metabolize to salicylic acid. More than 60 years ago, Dr. L.L. Craven, an astute otolaryngologist practicing in Glendale, Calif., observed that his tonsillectomy patients who chewed an aspirin-containing gum excessively tended to bleed more profusely after their surgery. He reasoned that aspirin might be useful in preventing myocardial infarction (MI) and began treating all his older male patients with it.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In two astonishingly prescient papers, both published in the Mississippi Valley Medical Journal, Dr. Craven claimed that none of the 8,000 men he had treated during his years in practice had succumbed to either an MI or a stroke.4 Who needs randomized, controlled studies when the data is so good? Ironically, Dr. Craven himself died of an MI a year following the study’s publication. Yes, he was an aspirin user.

For many years, it remained unclear whether NSAIDs or selective COX inhibitors provided a similar benefit. Nearly a decade ago, the answer came crashing down. A major study of the selective COX-2 inhibitor, rofecoxib, in preventing adenomatous polyps found the drug highly effective.5 The really bad news was that there appeared to be a spike in the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events in the treated patients. Actually, this spike turned into a flood. It has been estimated that rofecoxib may have accounted for an excess of 88,000 to 140,000 cases of serious heart disease over the course of its few years on the U.S. market.6

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

It soon became apparent that all NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors lacked the highly beneficial and sometimes lifesaving effect of aspirin on the production of TxA2. Playing with TxA2 levels, the rabbit aorta contracting substance, was clearly life contracting for some patients.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsDrug UpdatesOpinionResearch RheumRheuminationsSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:anti-inflammatoryBiosimilarsdrugHelfgottpatient careResearchrheumatologistrofecoxib

Related Articles
    A Comprehensive Review of NSAID Cardiovascular Toxicity

    A Comprehensive Review of NSAID Cardiovascular Toxicity

    July 18, 2018

    Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most used drugs for acute and chronic pain. More than 30 billion doses of NSAIDs are consumed annually from more than 70 million prescriptions.1 Despite their common use, NSAIDs are not free of serious toxicities. In the pre-Vioxx (rofecoxib) era, gastrointestinal toxicity was the primary concern for many NSAIDs….

    NSAIDs: The Heart of the Controversy

    June 1, 2007

    Rheumatologists on the AHA statement and how to balance NSAID risks and benefits

    Osteoarthritis Quo Vadis

    March 1, 2008

    Our knowledge of OA has progressed far—does a cure lie ahead?

    Top Research in Axial Spondyloarthritis Presented at ACR Convergence 2022

    November 18, 2022

    PHILADELPHIA—Approximately 100 research abstracts on axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) were accepted for presentation at ACR Convergence 2022. It is exciting to see a wealth of research on axSpA being undertaken worldwide. Here, we highlight important points from 10 of these studies. 1. Abstract 0378: Prevalence of Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in Patients Treated for Chronic Back Pain…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences