Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

A Comparison of the Canadian and U.S. Healthcare Systems

Simon M. Helfgott, MD  |  Issue: February 2012  |  February 3, 2012

Second, the Canadian system delivers care privately (such as office, clinics, or hospitals) yet is financed by taxpayer dollars. For the most part, doctors are free to run their practices as private businesses. Depending on the province, physicians can bill patients separately for noncovered services, such as cosmetic dermatology or certain imaging and lab studies. Some rheumatologists in Quebec will charge their patients an additional $40 for the cost of supplies for joint injections. Other physicians have taken a page out of the American concierge medicine experience and adapted it to their system. Because there is a dire shortage of primary care physicians (PCPs), many are charging patients annual membership fees of about $200–$500 in order to join a practice. If a patient chooses not to join, then they must contend with an a la carte menu of eye-popping charges for the work their doctors perform. For example, the fee to fax a prescription refill can run as high as $30, and an e-mail reply to a patient costs about $50 to $75. Many of the provincial regulators have allowed these charges to continue, preferring not to clash with the dwindling number of PCPs.

Third, the system is fairly simple to operate. Everyone is issued a healthcare card, which serves as the “credit card” to cover services. This is great for the patient because there is no paperwork to complete and for the most part few, if any, copayments. Physicians submit their charges electronically so that most offices can run on a skeleton support staff. There is only one insurance plan to deal with and the rules and coverage are universal. According to a recent study in Health Affairs, physicians in Ontario only spent about 27% of the total money spent by the average U.S. physician in administrative costs. The per-physician cost of dealing with payers was $22,205 a year in Canada and $82,975 in the United States. They also wasted (my word) only 1/10th the amount of time spent by U.S. physicians in dealing with health plans, according to the study.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

This ties into the fourth point; there is single list of covered procedures and charges. This is fairly straightforward when compared with the Untied States, where there are separate lists for Medicare, Medicare advantage plans, Medicaid, the Blues, the privates, the indemnities, the HMOs, and so on. In Canada, the submitted physician charge and the payment are identical. It is a non-negotiable amount and does not vary from provider to provider. No more bloated “paper charges” in an effort to drive up the cost of the receivable.

Potential Problems with Single Payer

So these are some of the wonderful attributes of the single-payer universal healthcare system. A casual observer may wonder why this type of plan has met with so much resistance in the United States. I think I can offer a few reasons.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Legislation & AdvocacyOpinionProfessional TopicsRheuminationsSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:ACAAffordable Care Act (ACA)BillingCodingdrugHealthcare ReformHelfgottimagingInternationalLegislationMedicarePractice Managementsingle payer

Related Articles

    Bending, Not Breaking

    August 16, 2019

    “And of course, I am not telling you to do it. That would be illegal.” As a general rule, I try not to instruct my patients to break the law. My business model depends on repeat customers, so placing a patient at risk of getting arrested—even if that risk is remote—doesn’t seem like a good…

    Avoid the Trap of Balance Billing

    June 13, 2016

    It is no secret that payers and providers have conflict as it relates to reimbursement rates for medical services, and there is another stakeholder, the patient, that plays an important role in the financial impact of healthcare reimbursement. Usually, patients are faced with unforeseen bills from their providers due to an unpaid portion of a…

    What the Affordable Care Act Means for Rheumatology

    January 1, 2014

    Expected to flood the healthcare system with an influx of insured patients, Obamacare will likely exacerbate physician shortages, worsen capacity issues for many rheumatologists, and pressure providers to deliver a measurable quality of care, but analysts say rheumatology patients will benefit from expanded insurance coverage options

    One-Third of U.S. Healthcare Spending Is Administrative Costs

    January 7, 2020

    (Reuters Health)—U.S. insurers and providers spent more than $800 billion in 2017 on administration, or nearly $2,500 per person—more than four times the per-capita administrative costs in Canada’s single-payer system, a new study finds. Over one-third of all healthcare costs in the U.S. were due to insurance company overhead and provider time spent on billing,…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences