Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Phase 3 Studies Evaluate Lesinurad for Gout Treatment

Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP  |  July 15, 2015

GENERIC_Drugs_500x270In the CLEAR 1 study presented June 12 at the 2015 meeting of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), researchers investigated lesinurad, a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor (SURI), combined with xanthine oxidase inhibitors, for treating gout.1

Patients with an inadequate response to standard care were randomized to receive 200 mg (n = 201) or 400 mg (n = 201) of lesinurad daily in combination with allopurinol or allopurinol plus placebo (n = 201). This 12-month, randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 study involved patients 18–85 years old on stable, appropriate allopurinol doses, ranging from 200–600 mg—most receiving 300 mg. At study screening, all patients had a serum uric acid (sUA) level ≥ 6.5 mg/dL and had two or more gout flares in the previous year. The baseline sUA measurement was 6.94 ± 1.27 mg/dL, with 14.3% having tophi.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving the sUA target of < 6.0 mg/dL by Month 6. Secondary endpoints were mean gout flare rate requiring treatment (GFRT, Months 6–12) and the proportion of patients with complete resolution of one or more target tophi by Month 12. Treatment-emergent adverse events and laboratory data were assessed.

Both lesinurad-treated groups had significantly increased proportions of patients achieving sUA targets compared with placebo plus allopurinol-treated patients. Approximately twice as many patients achieved these targets at Month 6. At Month 6, sUA < 6 mg/dL, lesinurad 200 mg results were 54%, lesinurad 400 mg results were 59% and placebo results were 28%. The majority of patients were male (94%) with a mean ± SD age of 51.9 ± 11.3 years and a duration of gout disease of 11.8 ± 9.4 years. There were no significant differences observed between groups in mean rate of GFRT (Month 6–12) or patients with complete target tophus resolution (by Month 12).

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The percentage of patients developing serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) or serious renal-related TEAEs was comparable between the 200 mg lesinurad group and the placebo-treated group. Patients who received 400 mg lesinurad had twice as many serious TEAEs or serious renal-related TEAEs. Additionally, more patients treated with 400 mg lesinurad developed a more-than-two-times increase in the serum creatinine (6% vs. 1% of 200 mg lesinurad-treated and 0% of placebo-treated patients). Most of the serum creatinine elevations resolved without stopping lesinurad. Lesinurad was generally well tolerated with a good clinical response.

In a CLEAR 2 study also presented at EULAR, Bardin et al evaluated the same study population and parameters with similar results.2 The majority of patients (n = 610) were male (96.2%) with a mean ± SD age of 51.2 ± 10.9 years and a duration of gout disease of 11.5 ± 9.3 years. Allopurinol doses ranged from 200–900 mg, with most receiving 300 mg.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsDrug UpdatesEULAR/OtherGout and Crystalline ArthritisMeeting Reports Tagged with:AllopurinolEULARGoutlesinurad

Related Articles

    Difficult Gout

    July 1, 2007

    “Grandpapa’s Torments” was the Rodnan Commemorative Gout Print featured at the 2005 ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific Meeting.

    Lesinurad with Allopurinol When Allopurinol Alone Is Insufficient

    December 29, 2016

    Current guidelines for the long-term management of gout recommend a combination of lifestyle management and/or pharmacotherapy to lower serum UA levels to <6.0 mg/dL in most patients or <5.0 mg/dL in patients with more severe disease. Allopurinol is the most widely used xanthine oxidase inhibitor and is recommended in treatment guidelines as a first-line urate-lowering…

    Reading Rheum

    December 1, 2009

    Handpicked Reviews of Contemporary Literature

    Clinical Insights into Gout Management: Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance Pt. 4

    October 14, 2019

    Three clinical experts on gout offer their insights into common management errors, clinical pearls, new safety data from the FDA and the role of biologic therapies in the management of gout.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences