Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

A Comparison of the Canadian and U.S. Healthcare Systems

Simon M. Helfgott, MD  |  Issue: February 2012  |  February 3, 2012

Finally, Canadian medical charts are not audited the way they are here. My Canadian friends look puzzled when I ask them about compliance issues. They have no idea what I am talking about. The U.S. system has spawned an entire industry serving the burgeoning needs of medical compliance. We are constantly under the microscope. Our notes and letters are scanned to see whether we have used all the requisite buzzwords to justify the charge for a certain level of care. This whole concept of excessive chart documentation recently took a startling turn. The following paragraph began appearing at the end of the office notes of physicians belonging to a prominent academic practice in Massachusetts:

“I hereby attest that the medical record entry accurately reflects signatures/notations that I made when I treated/diagnosed the above listed beneficiary. I do hereby attest that this information is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and I understand that any falsification, omission, or concealment of material fact may subject me to administrative, civil, or criminal liability.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Wow. Those last two words resonate: criminal liability. Isn’t this a medical note and not a legal document? Or is it the other way around? Attention Canadian friends, keep scribbling in your paper charts. This cannot happen without a cut-and-paste option.

As we head toward the November presidential election and the debates heat up, keep in mind that there is no such thing as a perfect healthcare system anywhere. We have the high-capacity and costly U.S. system, where an anxious patient of mine with persistently abnormal liver enzymes can get an abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, and MRI of the liver, all within 48 hours. Or there is the Canadian system, where such speed is nonexistent. Is there a way to incorporate universal coverage without bankrupting the whole system? This is a daunting challenge.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

 


Dr. Helfgott is physician editor of The Rheumatologist and associate professor of medicine in the division of rheumatology, immunology, and allergy at Harvard Medical School in Boston.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Legislation & AdvocacyOpinionProfessional TopicsRheuminationsSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:ACAAffordable Care Act (ACA)BillingCodingdrugHealthcare ReformHelfgottimagingInternationalLegislationMedicarePractice Managementsingle payer

Related Articles

    Bending, Not Breaking

    August 16, 2019

    “And of course, I am not telling you to do it. That would be illegal.” As a general rule, I try not to instruct my patients to break the law. My business model depends on repeat customers, so placing a patient at risk of getting arrested—even if that risk is remote—doesn’t seem like a good…

    Avoid the Trap of Balance Billing

    June 13, 2016

    It is no secret that payers and providers have conflict as it relates to reimbursement rates for medical services, and there is another stakeholder, the patient, that plays an important role in the financial impact of healthcare reimbursement. Usually, patients are faced with unforeseen bills from their providers due to an unpaid portion of a…

    What the Affordable Care Act Means for Rheumatology

    January 1, 2014

    Expected to flood the healthcare system with an influx of insured patients, Obamacare will likely exacerbate physician shortages, worsen capacity issues for many rheumatologists, and pressure providers to deliver a measurable quality of care, but analysts say rheumatology patients will benefit from expanded insurance coverage options

    One-Third of U.S. Healthcare Spending Is Administrative Costs

    January 7, 2020

    (Reuters Health)—U.S. insurers and providers spent more than $800 billion in 2017 on administration, or nearly $2,500 per person—more than four times the per-capita administrative costs in Canada’s single-payer system, a new study finds. Over one-third of all healthcare costs in the U.S. were due to insurance company overhead and provider time spent on billing,…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences