Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

ARCTIC Rewind: Effects of Half Dose of csDMARDs in Patients with RA in Remission

Lara C. Pullen, PhD  |  April 20, 2022

A European study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were in remission evaluated the effect of reducing their stable dose of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) by half. The study evaluated how this reduction affected the risk of flare and compared the half-dose strategy with continuing csDMARDs without reduction.

Siri Lillegraven, MD, MPH, a senior researcher at Diakonhjemet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, and colleagues documented fewer flares in the stable-dose group, a finding that does not support treatment with half-dose therapy. They published their results online May 4, 2021, in JAMA.1 

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

ACR vs. EULAR Guideline

Alireza Meysami, MD, a rheumatologist in the Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, who is not affiliated with the study, thinks this study answers an important question about reducing the dose of csDMARDs from the dose used to obtain RA remission. He explains that the 2021 ACR Duideline for the Treatment of RA recommends the starting doses of DMARDs, but does not suggest a tapering strategy.2 In contrast, EULAR recommendations suggest rheumatologists consider tapering csDMARDs in patients with RA who are in persistent remission with the treatment.3 Not only are the two recommendations inconsistent, but they leave rheumatologists with the concern that tapering the dose may result in the patient experiencing a flare. Indeed, the Tapering Strategy in Rheumatoid Arthritis (TARA) trial found a 33% flare rate over one year when tapering csDMARDs in patients who previously had controlled disease.4

“We do have a great plan to start patients on treatment,” says Dr. Meysami. “In RA, the cornerstone of the treatment is regulating or even suppressing the immune system. … A lot of patients express concerns, however. They ask, ‘How long are we going to continue the medications? Could I get by with a lower dose?’”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

This study addresses when and how to stop these medications.

Study Design

The randomized, open-label study included 160 patients with RA who had been in remission for 12 months. These patients had no swollen joints and fulfilled a set of remission criteria that included an extensive joint examination. They were receiving stable csDMARD therapy: most of the patients (82%) were on monotherapy with methotrexate; 10% were on methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine; and 8% were on other monotherapies or duo therapies. None of the patients were on biologic treatments. The investigators randomly assigned patients to receive a half-dose of csDMARDs or continue their stable dose of csDMARDS.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Uncategorized

Related Articles
    racorn/shutterstock.com

    EULAR Releases 2016 Recommendations on RA Management

    July 14, 2017

    Management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is complex. The ever-expanding availability of new drugs requires that rheumatologists and patients constantly consider treatment strategies and targets aimed at both disease control and symptom relief while remaining cognizant of the increasing high cost of emerging medications. Given such complexity, guidelines to inform rheumatologists about the most recent developments…

    Upadacitinib + Methotrexate & Other csDMARDs in RA Patients

    July 12, 2019

    A post-hoc analysis showed upadacitinib is safe and effective for treating RA patients when used with methotrexate or non-methotrexate csDMARDs…

    Drug Reduction Strategies, Disease Control for Patients with RA in Remission

    April 20, 2017

    WASHINGTON, D.C.—Clinical aspects of managing patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in remission were discussed by a panel of experts at the 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting during the session titled Rheumatoid Arthritis—Clinical Aspects IV: Managing Patients in Remission. Among the issues raised were strategies to taper or discontinue biologic therapies, as well as clinical predictors of…

    Target Remission

    March 1, 2007

    Strategies to identify and track remission in your RA patients

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences