Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Avoid the Trap of Balance Billing

From the College  |  Issue: June 2016  |  June 13, 2016

pogonici/shutterstock.com

pogonici/shutterstock.com

It is no secret that payers and providers have conflict as it relates to reimbursement rates for medical services, and there is another stakeholder, the patient, that plays an important role in the financial impact of healthcare reimbursement. Usually, patients are faced with unforeseen bills from their providers due to an unpaid portion of a claim. This is usually referred to as balance billing. Balance billing, also called “extra billing,” is defined as a healthcare provider billing a patient for the difference between what the patient’s health insurance chooses to reimburse and what the provider chooses to charge. For example, if the provider charges $100 for a service and the allowed amount is $70, the practice bills the patient the remaining $30. The question is: Does the patient actually owe the balance of a bill after their insurance pays?

To Bill or Not to Bill Is the Question

At a glance this may not seem like a problem, but if a provider is a preferred provider or contracted with a health plan, he or she may not balance bill for covered charges. The key is knowing when you can or cannot balance bill a patient. Billing a patient for any charges or balance of a bill above the allowable rate in the provider contract is considered illegal. Most healthcare plans will inform the provider as to what is permissible to collect or what the patient is responsible for under their coverage benefits. Practices can collect up front at the time of service for any co-pays, co-insurance, deductible or any amount due for services not covered by the patient’s plan.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

On the other hand, out-of-network physicians, those not bounded by contractual in-network rate agreements, have the ability to bill patients for the entire remaining balance. Keep in mind, if the insurance plan or the contract specifies that the patient is not responsible for any deductible, co-pay or co-insurance, then it is also illegal to bill the patient for any charges.

The rise in unpaid medical bills has a detrimental financial impact on physician practices and the healthcare system at large. The increase on administrative burdens and accounts receivable has unanticipated consequences to cost and budget in practices. The biggest problem practices are facing with balance billing is due to a lack of transparency from the insurance plans with their beneficiaries. There are some cases where patients are unaware they received care or services outside of their network until they receive the bill for the balance. Additionally, insurance plans deny or reject charges that should be paid, but inform patients that there is no balance on their bill—again, this leaves practices stuck with an unpaid bill or having to write off a lot of charges.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingFrom the CollegePractice Support Tagged with:AC&RAmerican College of Rheumatology (ACR)CodingHealth InsuranceMedicaidMedicarePractice Managementrheumatologist

Related Articles

    Practice Page: Is In-house or Outsourced Medical Billing Right for Your Physician Practice?

    February 1, 2014

    What to consider when deciding whether to delegate claims billing in-house or to contract with an outside company

    Medicare Incident-to Billing Rules, Pitfalls

    May 15, 2015

    In today’s busy rheumatology practices, the services of nurse practitioners, physician assistants, occupational therapists and clinical nurse specialists are a great asset for patient flow, as well as increased revenue. As the growth of nonphysician providers (NPPs) in rheumatology practices has evolved, it has become increasingly important to understand the incident-to rules and avoid the…

    How to Bill Medicare Patients for Non-Covered Services

    April 19, 2017

    What do you do when you are presented with a patient who needs treatment but the patient’s insurance company will not pay for the services? Can you provide the services anyway? Who will pay for them? How do you collect payment for such services? If the patient consents to receive the services in spite of…

    New No-Surprises Rules May Affect Rheumatology Services at Hospitals

    April 15, 2022

    This month, we offer an overview of the federal No Surprises Act, which stipulates that healthcare insurers may not surprise patients with out-of-network care bills, instead requiring healthcare providers and insurers to broker price compromises between themselves. The No Surprises Act, enacted on a bipartisan basis in December 2020, protects patients from surprise billing from…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences