Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

BATTER-UP Takes Swing at Potential RA Biomarkers

Sue Pondrom  |  March 10, 2011

In a collaborative effort between the pharmaceutical industry, academia, and community rheumatologists, researchers are evaluating a new biomarker screening test that might help identify patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are unlikely to benefit from anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) medications.

Titled the “Biomarkers of Anti-TNF Treatment Efficacy in Rheumatoid Arthritis–Unresponsive Populations (BATTER-UP),” the study is enrolling 1,000 patients with moderate to severe disease who have had an unsatisfactory response to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and are about to start treatment with an anti-TNF agent, or who have had an inadequate response to an initial anti-TNF drug and are about to switch to a different one.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“There is a crying need to understand whether there are genetic or other biomarker predictors of TNF response in RA,” says co-lead investigator Peter Gregersen, MD, director of the Center for Genomics and Human Genetics at the North Shore-Long Island Jewish Hospital’s Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in Manhasset, N.Y. “Only 30% of RA patients have a really robust response to TNFs. Close to 30% have no response at all. We don’t have any idea what distinguishes those two groups of people.”

Get Involved

Interested in being a part of BATTER-UP? Contact Crescendo Bioscience at [email protected] or 855-874-3544 for more information.

The BATTER-UP study will test an eight-gene biomarker set that Dr. Gregersen and colleagues have previously identified as predictive of anti-TNF responsiveness in RA patients.1 The genes are CLTB, MXRA7, CXorf52, COL4A3BP, YIPF6, FAM44A, SFRS2, and PGK1.

“With 1,000 patients, we should find out if Dr. Gregersen’s preliminary data are correct,” says co-lead investigator Michael E. Weinblatt, MD, John R. and Eileen K. Riedman professor of medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. He added that if “we see something in this study, we want a larger study to validate it before a test can be available for clinical use.” He estimated that the BATTER-UP study, from enrollments to evaluations, will probably last about two years. Further, the study consortium is structured as an academia–industry collaboration with a scientific Advisory board and publication team to ensure rapid dissemination of research.

“It would be great to have a laboratory test that would assist us in making recommendations to patients about treatment approaches in this era of multiple targeted therapies,” Dr. Weinblatt says. “We don’t know yet which treatment will work best for each patient. This is one of the first steps to address this issue.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsResearch RheumRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:BiomarkersClinical researchRheumatoid arthritis

Related Articles

    Can Genetic Information Change the Clinical Care of Rheumatology Patients?

    February 15, 2017

    WASHINGTON, D.C.—Calling it an extremely challenging topic, Peter K. Gregersen, MD, professor and head, Robert S. Boas Center for Genomics and Human Genetics, Feinstein Institute, Manhasset, N.Y., said the current role of genetics in clinical practice is less about how to use genetic information to care for patients and more about how providers and patients…

    Biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis Remain Elusive

    February 1, 2015

    Biomarkers to assess disease progression are in use, but none can predict which therapy will work best for each patient

    Rheumatologist Lars Klareskog, MD, PhD, In the Spotlight

    December 1, 2014

    A career marked by scientific discovery, collaboration

    TNF Blockade for SLE

    September 1, 2010

    Reckless approach versus missed opportunity?

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences