Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Build Up Bone

Nancy Lane, MD, and Wei Yao, MD  |  Issue: June 2007  |  June 1, 2007

These and other issues have motivated a group of epidemiologists and clinicians who treat patients for osteoporosis to develop a new set of WHO recommendations for preventing osteoporotic fractures. The final document is not yet ready for dissemination. However, these new recommendations combine clinical risk factors that increase osteoporotic fracture risk (see Table 1) and a bone mineral density measurement—if available—to provide a 10-year risk of a hip fracture. The risk threshold used to recommend treatment may differ by country but, for the United States, hip fracture prevention treatment will be recommended if the 10-year risk is about 3%.1

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
click for large version

Therapies: Anti-Resorptive Agents

Medications for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis currently include anti-resorptive agents (bisphosphonates, selective estrogen receptor modulators, calcitonin, and estrogen) and one anabolic agent (rhPTH 1-34 or teriparatide). (See Table 2) Physicians generally initiate therapy for patients with osteoporosis with a bisphosphonate; if the patient suffers fractures or is intolerant to the oral or intravenous bisphosphonates, rhPTH 1-34 is prescribed. Because osteoporosis is a chronic disease, physicians usually initiate treatment for patients who are around age 60 and will continue to monitor the patients bone status for another 20 to 25 years. Like patients with any other chronic disease who take a medication for a long time, osteoporosis patients ask their physicians if they need to continue the medication. Generally this happens after five or more years of weekly therapy with a bisphosphonate. This is a difficult question to answer because the clinical trials performed for FDA approval only last for three years, and information on fracture reduction after that period is not available for most of the osteoporosis agents now in use.

An extension study, Fracture Intervention Trial Long-Term Extension (FLEX), was recently published. This study addressed the duration of therapy and evaluated patients enrolled in the Fracture Intervention Study (FIT) who had been on alendronate for three years. These patients had a T score of the total hip or femoral neck of greater than -3.0 (higher than the mean at entry into the FIT trial). Nearly 1,000 women were randomized to placebo, 5 mg of alendronate a day, or 10 mg of alendronate a day for three years. Study endpoints included bone mineral density, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and incident vertebral and nonvertebral fractures.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Although study subjects were off medication for between one and two years, those randomized to the placebo lost about 2% of hip bone mass but had no decline in lumbar spine bone mass. They also had increasing CTX-1 (a marker of osteoclast activity) but no increase in morphometric vertebral fractures or nonvertebral fractures compared with the alendronate-treated subjects.2 These findings suggest that, in patients who have been treated with a bisphosphonates for more than three years, it is probably safe to discontinue the medication if they have responded well, have a T score of the total hip or femoral neck of greater than -2.5, have not experienced a low-impact fracture while on the medication, and have low risk of an osteoporotic fracture.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsOsteoarthritis and Bone Disorders Tagged with:bonebone mineral density (BMD)DiagnosisDrugsFracturesOsteoporosisosteoporosis treatmentspatient careriskSafetyscreeningtherapy

Related Articles

    Osteoporosis Experts Discuss Bisphosphonate Holidays

    November 24, 2020

    ACR CONVERGENCE 2020—Bisphosphonates are an important treatment for millions of older Americans with osteoporosis because the drugs inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption to reduce the risk of painful, debilitating fractures.1 More than 20 years ago, data emerged that bisphosphonates have a long terminal half-life.2 So after years of therapy, could some patients take a drug holiday?…

    Unexpected Benefits of Bisphosphonates after Hip Fracture

    February 3, 2012

    Recent trials show this bisphosphonates can reduce subsequent hip fractures and mortality, while remaining cost effective.

    Reading Rheum

    March 1, 2007

    Handpicked Reviews of Contemporary Literature

    Diagnosis, Management of Medication-Induced Osteonecrosis of the Bone

    October 13, 2015

    Prior to the widespread use of bisphosphonates for the manage­ment of osteoporosis, multiple myeloma and metastatic cancer to the skeletal system, osteonecrosis of the jawbones was an infrequent condition seen after radiation for oral cancers (osteoradionecrosis) and in chronic odontogenic infections.1 Since the mid-2000s, osteonecrosis of the jawbones has been noted to occur as a…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences