Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Can We Get Closer to a Cure for RA?

Marc Feldmann & Ravinder N. Maini  |  September 1, 2015

Despite new therapeutics, progress for patients has virtually stalled over the past 10 years. With all available chemical and biological DMARDs, the expectation is that approximately 60% of patients will improve by 20% (ACR20), 40% will improve by 50% (ACR50), and 20% will improve by 70% (ACR70). If expressed by the useful DAS (disease activity score), by reduction from a high to a sustained level of low, or less commonly, remission level in about 50% of treated patients. Of course, these numbers are crude approximations of benefit that depend on many factors, e.g. worse for long disease duration, impaired physical function, structural damage and high disease activity, but also influenced by age, smoking history and high body mass index.

With $25 billion sales annually and with an aging population, it is clear that commercial success has outstripped health care resources. The mismatch is beginning to impact on willingness to pay and impedes research into new and existing expensive medicines. With the advent of ‘biosimilars,’ there is an opportunity to address the high cost of therapy. Regrettably unlike the dramatic falls in price when small chemical ‘drugs’ go off patent (90% or so), the early indications in Europe, where the first anti-TNF biosimilar mimicking infliximab are marketed as Inflectra (by Hospira) and as Remsima (by Celltrion), the cost saving is relatively small.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

What Are The Possible Solutions?
Is there a path forward? Might combination therapy in RA be the solution?

Editor’s note: In this article, the authors discuss many options and the evidence for them, including:

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
  • The combination of low dose methotrexate and anti-TNF;
  • Angiogenesis;
  • Targeting tissue damage pathways directly;
  • Antigen-specific therapy;
  • Potential combination of TNF and IL17 blockade; and
  • Targeting inhibitory receptors and regulatory T cells.

The authors end with a call to action: “[I]t is clear that the revolution is incomplete; it has not resulted in ‘cures.’ As a therapeutic community we need to pick up the challenge again and get the job completed.”

Read the full article.

Excerpted and adapted from:
Feldmann M, Maini RN. Perspectives from masters in rheumatology and autoimmunity: Can we get closer to a cure for rheumatoid arthritis? Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Sep;67(9):2283–2291.

Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsResearch RheumRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:Arthritis & Rheumatologycombination therapycureDrugsRheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Related Articles

    TNF Blockade for SLE

    September 1, 2010

    Reckless approach versus missed opportunity?

    Are We Playing It Safe?

    October 1, 2010

    Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibition and the risk of solid malignancies

    Remembering Etanercept & the Advent of the Biologic Era

    February 10, 2020

    As a veteran rheumatologist, I remember the clinical trials of etanercept’s (Enbrel’s) efficacy. And when the drug was first approved in 1998, I participated in those clinical trials and realized the effectiveness was astonishing. It was easy to tell which patients were treated with etanercept vs. those who received placebo, even though both groups were…

    Reading Rheum

    April 1, 2007

    Handpicked Reviews of Contemporary Literature

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences