Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Careful Collaboration: 5 Tips for Participating in Clinical Trials

Richard Quinn  |  March 18, 2016

GENERIC_Science_Research_500x270Collaboration can be a good thing. Some collaborative clinical trials produce life-changing results. But not all collaborations are right for rheumatologists, according to the scientific director of the Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG).

“Very often when you do investigator-initiated trials or trials with an inexperienced group, the study starts in one direction and then it morphs [to take] another direction,” says Hermine Brunner, MD, MSc, MBA, FACR, professor of pediatrics, endowed chair and director of the Division of Rheumatology at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In a recent interview with The Rheumatologist, she outlined five important elements to look for when considering a clinical trial collaboration.

  1. Clear scope, tangible objectives: Make sure the trial has a clear goal and timeline. “A lot of times people don’t have a clear focus,” she says. “A couple years into the study, nobody has a publication, the money is running out, and people are upset.”
  2. Training: The National Institutes of Health offers free materials online that outline what to look for when taking on clinical trials, as well as the legal implications. “[The resource] is very useful,” Dr. Brunner says. “[The training] is a bit time consuming, but at least you will understand what you are getting into.”
  3. Long-term commitment: Brunner says most clinical trials take about “five times as much time as spelled out” in a proposal, adding that agreements between universities need to be renewed every year, which can be a “nightmare.” Relying on other sites to produce and exchange data can be a challenge. “You have to constantly interact,” she says.
  4. Leadership: The best collaborations have clear leadership, so make sure roles and responsibilities are well defined. “Collaborate when you know what the timelines are, what the objectives are, the deliverables, and you know who will analyze the data and what the publication line is,” she says.
  5. Beware of hidden costs: Investigators won’t get reimbursed for $50 worth of dry ice if dry ice is not specifically outlined in the budget. Annual reviews and safety reporting can take a lot of time and, Dr. Brunner warns, might not be reimbursable. “You don’t want to lose money when you do a study,” she says. “You need to be very careful in the budgeting process.”

Richard Quinn is a freelance writer in New Jersey.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Share: 

Filed under:Career DevelopmentProfessional TopicsResearch Rheum Tagged with:Clinical researchclinical trialscollaborationTraining

Related Articles

    CARRA

    May 16, 2011

    Working for Children with Rheumatic Diseases

    Stage 2 of the EHR Incentive Program

    October 7, 2011

    Although reporting for Stage 1 of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program began just this year, the rules, objectives, and measures for Stage 2 are already being established. Last June, the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health Information Technology (IT) presented CMS with its recommendations for Stage 2 of the CMS EHR Incentive Program which builds on the Stage 1 objectives supporting EHR utilization for data capture and sharing.

    Measuring Up for Meaningful Use

    April 13, 2011

    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS’) Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program—Meaningful Use—requires that eligible providers participating in the incentive program successfully demonstrate meaningful use of the EHR system by reporting on a set of core and menu functional objectives to qualify for incentive payments of up to $44,000.

    Mitigate Risk and Increase Success of Lupus Clinical Trials

    August 1, 2010

    Design strategies from a Lupus Research Institute conference

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences