Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Common Characteristics in RA Patients Who Don’t Respond to Biologics

Vanessa Caceres  |  Issue: May 2019  |  May 18, 2019

The Practical Implications

The findings can help rheumatologists with patient management decisions, according to the authors.

“Quantifying the frequency of multiple bDMARD class failure is crucial, particularly in an environment where bDMARD choice is largely based on custom and experience rather than by individual biomarkers,” the authors wrote.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Study researcher Kimme L. Hyrich, MD, PhD, from the Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology at the University of Manchester, England, had some additional thoughts. “This is an important finding [because] it allows the rheumatology community and funders the opportunity to better design services with the knowledge of the numbers of patients who will require regular clinical review,” Dr. Hyrich says. “As the choice of biologics and other related therapies increases, particularly with respect to new modes of action, it will be important for budget planning to ensure that funding for these drugs is not rejected based solely on the number of biologics a patient has previously received.”

The findings also can help with guideline development, including the management of difficult-to-treat RA, which is a focus of a new European League Against Rheumatism task force, Dr. Hyrich says.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Stanley Cohen, MD, a clinical professor in the department of internal medicine at the UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, and in private practice in Dallas, expresses surprise that a higher percentage of patients wasn’t biologic refractory, although that may be due to the authors’ definition of refractory, he says. “It was interesting that rheumatologists are cycling therapies more frequently now than in the past, which I think reflects the treat-to-target approach targeting remission/low disease activity status as well as patient expectations,” Dr. Cohen says.

Dr. Cohen would like to see similar research performed in the U.S. and a consistent definition of refractory disease established so clinicians can accurately compare observational study results in different populations.


Vanessa Caceres is a medical writer in Bradenton, Fla.

References

  1. Kearsley-Fleet L, Davies R, De Cock D, et al. Biologic refractory disease in rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Oct;77(10):1405–1412.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:biologic-refractory RArefractory rheumatoid arthritis

Related Articles

    Drug Reduction Strategies, Disease Control for Patients with RA in Remission

    April 20, 2017

    WASHINGTON, D.C.—Clinical aspects of managing patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in remission were discussed by a panel of experts at the 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting during the session titled Rheumatoid Arthritis—Clinical Aspects IV: Managing Patients in Remission. Among the issues raised were strategies to taper or discontinue biologic therapies, as well as clinical predictors of…

    Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance, Part 3: Rheumatoid Arthritis

    August 16, 2019

    Over the past few years, bio­similars and other new drugs have been introduced to treat rheumatic illnesses. Some of the conditions we treat have numerous drug options, others have few or only off-label options. This series, “Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance,” provides streamlined information on the administration of biologic, biosimilar and small molecule inhibitor drugs…

    Using Ultrasound to Diagnose Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

    April 26, 2018

    Note: Updated May 2, 2018, to correct a link in the reference section. The error was introduced in editing. A 44-year-old Caucasian woman presented to the outpatient rheumatology clinic that had followed her for several years for rheumatoid arthritis. She was compliant with her regimen of hydroxychloroquine, etanercept and salsalate. Her chief complaint was worsening…

    Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors May Slow the Progression of Spondyloarthritis

    November 16, 2021

    Recent research indicates tumor necrosis factor inhibitors may slow disease progression in the spine of patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences