Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

How to Document E/M Services

Kimberly Retzlaff  |  October 5, 2016

Documenting evaluation and management (E/M) services involves many factors, and it’s important to code to the most appropriate level of service to avoid compliance risks. To assist providers with documentation, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) provides its 1995 and 1997 Documentation Guidelines for Evaluation and Management Services. For billing purposes, either version (but not a combination of the two) can be used to document a patient encounter.

To select the appropriate level of E/M services provided, the three key components to consider—as defined by the American Medical Association’s Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] and endorsed by the CMS—are history, examination and medical decision making (MDM).

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

History
The four history types are:

  1. Problem focused;
  2. Expanded problem focused;
  3. Detailed; and
  4. Comprehensive.

Each type has required documentation elements that, according to the CMS’ Evaluation and Management Services guide, may include:

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
  • Chief complaint;
  • History of present illness;
  • Review of systems; and
  • Pertinent past, family and/or social history.

Examination
The levels of E/M services are based on the four types of history/examination. In documenting examinations, the CMS recommends keeping the following in mind:

  • Document specific, abnormal and relevant negative findings;
  • Describe abnormal or unexpected findings of the examinations of any asymptomatic body area(s) or organ system(s); and
  • Use a brief statement or notation indicating “negative” or “normal” to document normal findings related to unaffected area(s) or asymptomatic organ system(s).

Medical Decision Making
“Medical decision making is a key component of E/M, [and] includes the number of diagnoses and treatment options, data to be reviewed and level of risk to the patient,” says Raemarie Jimenez, CPC, CPB, CPMA, CPPM, CPC-I, CCS, vice president of membership and certification for AAPC.

The CMS lists four types of decision making: straightforward, low complexity, moderate complexity and high complexity. Billing for an E/M service requires selecting a code that best represents patient type (i.e., new or established), setting (e.g., physician’s office) and level of service performed. Further, “Because the level of E/M service is dependent on two or three key components, performance and documentation of one component (e.g., examination) at the highest level does not necessarily mean that the encounter in its entirety qualifies for the highest level of E/M service,” according to the CMS.

Medical necessity also comes into play with regard to the level of service provided. The CMS notes that the volume of documentation does not provide a rationale for determining the specific level of service to bill.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingPractice SupportProfessional Topics Tagged with:documentation guidelinesE/M CodingE/M serviceEvaluation and ManagementMedical decision makingrelative value units

Related Articles
    Prepare NOW for ICD-10 Medical Coding Transition

    Prepare NOW for ICD-10 Medical Coding Transition

    July 14, 2015

    The ICD-10 page on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) website features a countdown clock that shows the time left until Oct. 1, 2015, the date on which compliance with the new code set becomes mandatory. By the time this issue goes to press, the clock will read 90 or fewer days. Time…

    Electronic Health Record Documentation Guidelines

    January 19, 2018

    The operations management team in healthcare practices is expected to have an effective coding compliance program in place that is continually evaluated and reevaluated. To accurately assess the program’s effectiveness, several outcome indicators must be measured, including error rates in the provider’s documentation and the electronic health record (EHR). Due to increased scrutiny by the…

    Practice Page: Is In-house or Outsourced Medical Billing Right for Your Physician Practice?

    February 1, 2014

    What to consider when deciding whether to delegate claims billing in-house or to contract with an outside company

    Medicare Incident-to Billing Rules, Pitfalls

    May 15, 2015

    In today’s busy rheumatology practices, the services of nurse practitioners, physician assistants, occupational therapists and clinical nurse specialists are a great asset for patient flow, as well as increased revenue. As the growth of nonphysician providers (NPPs) in rheumatology practices has evolved, it has become increasingly important to understand the incident-to rules and avoid the…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences