Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Etanercept Biosimilar Is Effective, Well-Tolerated for Rheumatoid Arthritis

David Douglas  |  February 16, 2018

NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—The biosimilar LBEC0101 is equivalent to etanercept (Enbrel) in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who respond inadequately to methotrexate, according to researchers from Korea and Japan.

As Dr. Yeong-Wook Song tells Reuters Health by email, “LBEC0101 is comparable in efficacy, safety and immunogenicity profile to Enbrel.” The findings, he adds, could help allow patients access “to this cost-effective anti-TNF drug.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In a Jan. 22 online article in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Dr. Song of Seoul National University Hospital and colleagues report data from 374 patients (mean age, 54; 85% women) randomized to receive LBEC0101 or etanercept.1

The primary efficacy endpoint, assessed at week 24, was the change from baseline in the disease activity score in 28 joints, according to the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR).

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The least-squares mean change from baseline in DAS28-ESR at 24 weeks was a drop of 3.01 in the biosimilar group, similar to the 2.86 drop in the etanercept group. The two groups also had similar ACR20 response rates, as well as similar adverse-event rates.

However, development of anti-drug antibodies was significantly less common in the LBEC0101 group (1.6% vs. 9.6% with etanercept). The researchers have not yet established a reason for this difference.

They also caution that because the study was conducted only in Japan and Korea, “the generalizability of the findings may be limited to the Asian population and a longer-term study is warranted.” They go on to say, though, that given the great similarity of the agents, LBEC0101 “is very likely to be insensitive to both intrinsic and extrinsic ethnic factors.”

The investigators are currently conducting an extension study to evaluate the long-term safety, efficacy and immunogenicity of LBEC0101.

Dr. G. Caleb Alexander, co-director of the Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, in Baltimore, tells Reuters Health by email, “The study was randomized, blinded and examined both efficacy and safety of these products, all of which should increase confidence in the results. This was a well-done study and supports the comparability (or biosimilarity) of LBEC0101 and etanercept.”

“The study adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting the similarity of TNF-alpha biosimilars and their referent products,” Dr. Alexander adds. “TNF-alpha inhibitors are a common and costly group of biologic therapies. … Of course, the ultimate clinical and economic potential of biosimilars will depend upon a lot more than these types of clinical trials.”

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsDrug Updates Tagged with:BiosimilarsetanerceptLBEC0101Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Related Articles

    Possible Impact of Biosimilar Infliximab on U.S. Market in Prescriptions, Pricing

    September 8, 2016

    The use of biosimilars for rheuma­tology in the U.S. became a reality when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb), a biosimilar to Remicade (infliximab), in April. What this may mean is increased competition among drug companies with regard to pricing and, therefore, potentially lower costs for U.S. patients, according to Seoyoung…

    Rheumatology Drug Updates

    February 1, 2014

    Information on new approvals and medication safety that rheumatologists need to know

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    April 15, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

    Remembering Etanercept & the Advent of the Biologic Era

    February 10, 2020

    As a veteran rheumatologist, I remember the clinical trials of etanercept’s (Enbrel’s) efficacy. And when the drug was first approved in 1998, I participated in those clinical trials and realized the effectiveness was astonishing. It was easy to tell which patients were treated with etanercept vs. those who received placebo, even though both groups were…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences