Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

FDA Requires New Boxed Warnings on JAK Inhibitors, Places Restrictions on Use

Keri Losavio  |  Issue: October 2021  |  September 1, 2021

On Sept. 1, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) announced that it is requiring revisions to the Boxed Warning for the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors Xeljanz/Xeljanz XR (tofacitinib), Olumiant (baricitinib) and Rinvoq (upadacitinib) to include information about the risks of serious heart-related events, cancer, blood clots and death.1

Recommendations for healthcare professionals will include consideration of the benefits and risks for individual patients prior to initiating or continuing therapy. In addition, to ensure the benefits of a JAK inhibitor outweigh the risks in patients who receive them, the FDA is limiting all approved uses to certain patients who have not responded to or cannot tolerate one or more tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Changes will also be made to several sections of the prescribing information and to the patient medication guide.

The Great Debate at ACR Convergence 2020 focused on the question, “Should Jakinibs Be Used Before Biologics after Methotrexate Failure in RA?” It seems the FDA has now answered that question for rheumatologists.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The Basis

Based on a completed review of a large randomized safety clinical trial, the FDA concluded tofacitinib carry an increased risk of serious heart-related events, such as heart attack or stroke, cancer, blood clots and death.1 This trial compared tofacitinib with TNF blockers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The trial’s final results also showed an increased risk of blood clots and death with the lower dose of tofacitinib. A prior Drug Safety Communication, based on earlier results from this trial, reported an increased risk of blood clots and death only seen at the higher dose.2

When tofacitinib was first approved, the FDA required the manufacturer, Pfizer, to conduct a randomized safety clinical trial in patients with RA who were taking methotrexate to evaluate the risk of cardiovascular events, malignancy and infections. According to the FDA report, the study was a multi-center, randomized, open-label trial to evaluate two doses of tofacitinib (5 mg twice daily [N=1455], which is the approved dosage for RA, and a higher 10 mg twice daily dosage [N=1456]) in comparison to treatment with a TNF blocker (N=1451).1 Patients in the trial were required to be 50 years of age or older and have at least one cardiovascular risk factor. The co-primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke; and malignancy, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC). The trial was designed to exclude a prespecified risk margin of 1.8 for the hazard ratio of combined tofacitinib regimens when compared with the TNF blocker control for each co-primary endpoint. The median on-study follow-up time was four years.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Drug Updates Tagged with:baricitinibJAK inhibitorsjakinibsTofacitinibupadacitinib

Related Articles

    JAK Inhibitors: Are All Promises Fulfilled?

    July 22, 2022

    A decade after JAK inhibitors were approved, this EULAR 2022 session looks at whether the drugs have lived up to expectations.

    Updates on JAK Inhibitor Safety, COVID-19 Vaccination in Immunosuppressed Patients & More

    December 7, 2021

    ACR CONVERGENCE 2021—The ACR Convergence 2021 meeting reflected the continued advancement of science and practical research in the field of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Among the most important topics this year in RA was the evolution of the risk-benefit profile of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, for which new safety data emerged in a series of related…

    Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance, Part 3: Rheumatoid Arthritis

    August 16, 2019

    Over the past few years, bio­similars and other new drugs have been introduced to treat rheumatic illnesses. Some of the conditions we treat have numerous drug options, others have few or only off-label options. This series, “Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance,” provides streamlined information on the administration of biologic, biosimilar and small molecule inhibitor drugs…

    Tofacitinib with Methotrexate Not Inferior to Adalimumab with Methotrexate

    July 13, 2017

    Highlights from the 2017 EULAR Congress MADRID—Tofacitinib (a JAK inhibitor) used with methotrexate (MTX) is not inferior to adalimumab (a TNF inhibitor) plus MTX in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who’ve had an inadequate response to MTX alone, according to results of a Phase 3B/4 trial presented in a session at the Annual European Congress of…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences