Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Infection Rates for Patients with SLE on Immunosuppressive Drugs

Catherine Kolonko  |  Issue: June 2017  |  June 13, 2017

Results indicated that after six months, the incidence rate per 100 person-years for first serious hospitalized infection was 14.6 and 15.2 in patients treated with MMF and AZA, respectively (HR of MMF vs. AZA 0.99 [95% CI 0.74–1.32]). Similarly, a comparison of first serious infection between MMF and CYC revealed the incidence rate per 100 person-years was 24.1 and 24.6, respectively (HR 0.95 [95% CI 0.69–1.32]). Researchers also found that there were no differences in death rates among the three regimens.

Although “no differences were observed in our analyses between the specific immunosuppressive drug comparisons, the high burden of serious infections among SLE patients receiving these medications overall is important to consider,” the article states.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The lack of differences among the drugs studied with regard to serious infections could be useful from a clinical standpoint to assist physicians when treating lupus….Choosing one of these drugs over the other is not going to increase the patient’s risk of serious infection.

Practically Speaking

The lack of differences among the drugs studied with regard to serious infections could be useful from a clinical standpoint to assist physicians when treating lupus, Dr. Feldman says.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Rheumatologists often have a patient with a number of recurring infections. “It will be your time to choose their next drug,” Dr. Feldman explains. “You [should ask yourself, ‘Which] of the drugs I would potentially prescribe [has] the lowest risk of serious infection associated with it?’”

One thing this study reveals is that choosing one of these drugs over the other is not going to increase the patient’s risk of serious infection, Dr. Feldman says.

“[Patients] are going to have an increased risk just by virtue of being put on either immunosuppressive drug, but one drug does not appear to have a stronger association with serious infections than the other,” she says.

More Research Required

Dr. Feldman says there is room for further studies to investigate whether there is any difference in risk of infection after longer-term use of the medications included in the analysis.


Catherine Kolonko is a medical writer based in Oregon.

Reference

  1. Feldman CH, Marty FM, Winkelmayer WC, et al. Comparative rates of serious infections among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus receiving immunosuppressive medications. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Feb;69(2):387–397.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Tagged with:azathioprineClinicalcyclophosphamideimmunosuppressive drugsInfectionmycophenolate mofetiloutcomepatient careRheumatic DiseaserheumatologistrheumatologySLESystemic lupus erythematosus

Related Articles

    Immunosuppressive Treatment for Lupus in the Next Decade

    April 13, 2011

    It’s time for a new strategy

    Reading Rheum

    April 1, 2009

    Handpicked Reviews of Contemporary Literature

    Reading Rheum

    October 1, 2009

    Handpicked Reviews of Contemporary Literature

    Tacrolimus Use for Lupus Nephritis Raises Debate over Role in North American Population

    October 10, 2016

    The following summary regarding use of tacrolimus (TAC) in lupus nephritis highlights a number of debatable points. Although the role of TAC in lupus nephritis remains unproved for North American populations, it might be an excellent option in some clinical situations. These situations include lupus flare during pregnancy and also for lupus nephritis when the…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences