Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Is Predisone 3 mg/day an Appropriate Dose for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Theodore Pincus, MD  |  Issue: April 2013  |  April 1, 2013

  1. Documented efficacy in clinical trials of 5 mg/day, and 3 mg/day in a withdrawal clinical trial.3,11,13
  2. Doses of 5 mg/day or less generally are well tolerated.
  3. Doses of 5 mg/day are physiologic rather than pharmacologic, are incremental to normal endogenous production of glucocorticoids to maintain homeostasis, and do not lead to suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.31 Therefore, discontinuation does not lead to adrenal insufficiency or possible adrenocortical crisis.
  4. A prescription of 1–4 mg/day in 1-mg tablets allows a patient to titrate her/his own dosage to find an optimum level, with a minor (1- or 2-mg) increase when needed. Ironically, 1-mg tablets are more expensive than 5-mg prednisone tablets, but even prednisone 1 mg is one of the least expensive medications for a patient with RA.
  5. Over long periods, adverse events associated with 5 mg/day in clinical care are no greater, and may even be lower than expected.20

The case against prednisone in doses greater than 5 mg/day includes:

  1. Short-term doses of greater than 5 mg/day, especially of 20 mg/day even briefly, may be associated acutely in some patients, albeit infrequently, with adverse events including restlessness, irritability, insomnia, increased appetite, weight gain, and psychosis—effects almost never seen with 5 mg/day, which provides similar efficacy.25
  2. Although doses of 7.5–10 mg/day appear to have no more, and in some cases even fewer, adverse events than placebo in short-term studies over two years or less, over 5 years or longer, doses greater than 5 mg/day are associated with higher rates of hypertension and diabetes, infection, and increased mortality rates.7,10-12,15,16,20-22,32
  3. Doses greater than 5 mg/day taken over two to three weeks led to suppression of the HPA axis, requiring “coverage” if the patient experiences surgery, trauma, and/or other stressful events.

Discussion

The use of 3 mg/day in RA appears to provoke as much controversy as whether or not patients should take glucocorticoids at all. Advocates of glucocorticoids in RA suggest that 3 mg/day is an inadequate “placebo” dose which is within physiologic production under normal circumstances. By contrast, opponents of glucocorticoids in RA suggest that any glucocorticoid is harmful, so why expose a patient to 3 mg prednisone per day, particularly if regarded as a “placebo-type” dose? Perhaps, as in many compromises, if neither side finds the compromise satisfactory, it might be worthy of consideration.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 3 mg/day prednisone (or any medication) might ideally be documented in a randomized controlled trial protocol. However, it is not feasible or ethical to conduct a randomized study in RA over longer than two years, while effectiveness and safety data over five to 15 years are needed. Therefore, observational data are needed.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsDrug UpdatesRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:GlucocorticoidsprednisoneRARheumatoid arthritis

Related Articles

    The Peripatetitc Theodore Pincus, MD

    July 1, 2007

    Tireless champion for patient self-report

    The Science of MDHAQ/RAPID3 Scores

    December 12, 2011

    Do patient self-reports provide valid data for evidence-based care in rheumatology practice?

    Glucocorticoid Use in Rheumatoid Arthritis Management Focus of Ongoing Debate

    March 1, 2015

    Questions around prescribing steroids as bridge therapy, in long-term low dosages, or low-dose timed-release formulas, or not at all evoke controversy among rheumatologists

    Remote Use of the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ)

    December 18, 2019

    The patient medical history is far more prominent in clinical decisions for rheumatology than for many common chronic diseases in which a gold standard biomarker, such as blood pressure or serum glucose, is applicable to diagnosis and management of all individual patients.1 Components of a subjective patient history may be recorded as structured, quantitative, standard,…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences