Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Long-Term Apremilast Promising for Psoriatic Arthritis

Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP  |  Issue: September 2018  |  July 27, 2018

A recent study examined the long-term efficacy and safety of apremilast monotherapy in disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).1 During this five-year study, patients from the phase 3 PALACE-4 study were randomized 1:1:1 to receive placebo, 30 mg apremilast twice daily or 20 mg apremilast twice daily.

At Week 16, patients were eligible for early escape. Placebo patients were randomized to receive apremilast treatment, while apremilast patients remained on their assigned dose. At Week 24, all patients still receiving placebo were randomized to receive apremilast. Double-blind treatment continued through Week 52, with open-label apremilast treatment continuing for up to an additional four years. Among the three study groups, 527 patients were evenly randomized.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In the group treated with 30 mg of apremilast, 58%, 30% and 16% of patients, respectively, obtained modified ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 responses at Week 52. Of all the patients treated with 30 mg of apremilast randomized, 46% completed the Week 260 visit (Year 5). When apremilast was continued, improvement rates of PsA signs and symptoms and physical function were maintained up to Week 260. Swollen joint count rates were reduced by 85%, and tender joint count rates were reduced by 76%. Additionally, 66%, 39% and 20% of patients treated with 30 mg of apremilast achieved ACR20, 50 and 70, respectively, at Week 260.

Of patients treated with 30 mg of apremilast who had baseline enthesitis, 71% obtained a Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) of zero. This score is used to measure enthesitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, other spondylarthritides and PsA. Additionally, 95% of patients with baseline dactylitis obtained a joint count of zero at Week 260. HAQ-DI MCID ≥0.35, PASI-50 and PASI-75 responses were realized by 53%, 60% and 48%, respectively, in patients treated with 30 mg of apremilast at Week 260.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The most common adverse effect was nasopharyngitis (7%). Serious AEs occurred in five patients treated with 30 mg apremilast subjects, and serious infections were reported in two subjects patients treated with 30 mg apremilast (pelvic abscess and ESBL bacterial urinary tract infection requiring intravenous antibiotics).2 No opportunistic infections were reported during study Weeks 208–260, and no new safety signals were identified. In this study, use of 30 mg apremilast twice daily was well tolerated and had sustained improvements in PsA patients over the five-year study period.


Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP, is a freelance medical writer based in New York City and a pharmacist at New York Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Drug Updates Tagged with:apremilastPsoriatic Arthritis

Related Articles

    Psoriatic Arthritis: Advances in Therapeutics, Imaging & More Presented at ACR Convergence 2022

    December 1, 2022

    PHILADELPHIA—Selecting my top 10 picks for abstracts in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) at the ACR Convergence 2022 meeting was not easy because there was a great deal to review and learn from the 139 abstracts submitted to the meeting. I focused first and foremost on advances in therapeutics that encompassed both new and approved therapeutics, novel…

    Case Report: A Psoriatic Arthritis Patient with Dactylitis & Enthesitis

    September 20, 2018

    A 36-year-old woman presented at the Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center for a second opinion regarding a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). One year prior to our evaluation, she had developed pain and stiffness in her hands, feet, knees, ankles, elbows and shoulders. She had mild plaque psoriasis of the scalp and base of the neck,…

    Case Report: A Patient on Apremilast Develops Streptococcus Salivarius

    October 18, 2019

    Apremilast was first marketed in March 2014 for the treatment of adults with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). An immuno­modulating drug, which is a small molecule inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) specific for cyclic adenosine mono­phosphate (cAMP), apremilast is administered orally. By inhibiting PDE4, intracellular cAMP levels are increased. Although the exact mechanism of action is not…

    Psoriatic Arthritis: From Leeds to the Limelight

    August 1, 2009

    Advances in understanding of the disease begin in the 1960s

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences