Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

New Options for Treatment-Resistant RA

Carina Stanton  |  October 14, 2019

New enthusiasm is emerging among rheumatologists based on trial results for filgotinib and U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of upadacitinib—both Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor drug therapies, creating new treatment options for patients with treatment-resistant rheumatoid arthritis (RA), according to Mark Genovese, MD, a rheumatologist and clinical chief in the Division of Immunology and Rheumatology at Stanford University, Calif.

Dr. Genovese works as a trialist and consultant with Gilead and AbbVie, the companies responsible for developing these emerging JAK-inhibitor treatments. He has served as lead investigator in multi-phase, randomized, controlled clinical trials for both drugs.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Other JAK inhibitors currently on the market include tofacitinib and baricitinib.

Treatment Response
On Aug. 16, upadacitinib was approved by the FDA based on published clinical trial results that included findings from a phase 3 trial published in July 2019.1,2 In this clinical trial, 1,629 RA patients who had an inadequate response to methotrexate were randomized to receive 15 mg of upadacitinib once daily, placebo or 40 mg of adalimumab every other week while continuing a stable background dose of methotrexate. The results: Upadacitinib was superior to placebo and adalimumab for improving physical function and symptoms in RA patients who were receiving background methotrexate. Specifically, as measured by ACR20, 71% of upadacitinib-treated patients showed improvement compared with 36% of placebo-treated patients.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“It is impressive to see a new therapy demonstrate superiority vs. a TNF inhibitor plus methotrexate,” Dr. Genovese says.

Up to Week 26, adverse events, including serious infections, were comparable between the upadacitinib and adalimumab groups. The proportion of serious adverse events and events leading to treatment discontinuation was highest in the adalimumab group. Meanwhile, the upadacitinib group showed the highest proportion of patients with herpes zoster and creatine phosphokinase elevations.

In a randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial of filgotinib, 448 patients with active RA who had an inadequate response or intolerance to one or more biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDS) were assessed. An ACR20 clinical response was achieved at Week 12 in 66% of patients treated with 200 mg of filgotinib and 57.5% of patients treated with 100 mg of filgotinib, compared with 31.1% of placebo-treated patients. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis at 10.2% for 200 mg of filgotinib; headache, nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory infection (5.9% each) for 100 mg filgotinib; and RA (6.1%) for placebo.3

“One of the more impressive aspects in this trial was the level response in taking a fairly refractory group of active RA patients and achieving strong, low disease activity and remission outcomes,” Dr. Genovese says.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:drug treatmentfilgotinibRheumatoid Arthritis (RA)upadacitinib

Related Articles

    U.S. & E.U. Differ on Filgotinib for RA

    September 14, 2020

    This summer, the FDA rejected a new drug application for filgotinib to treat RA in the U.S., but a European Medicines Agency committee issued a positive opinion, moving filgotinib closer to authorized use in the E.U.

    FDA Approves Rituximab Biosimilar; Plus New Safety Data for Filgotinib in RA Patients

    January 7, 2019

    The FDA has approved Truxima (rituximab-abbs), which is biosimilar to Rituxan (rituximab), for treating adults with CD20-positive, B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma…

    Filgotinib Promising for RA

    August 26, 2019

    Research shows filgotinib may be safe and effective for treating rheumatoid arthritis. The drug’s manufacturer is expected to be submit a new drug application for filgotinib to the FDA in 2019…

    Tanezumab Promising for OA Pain; Plus, Filgotinib Investigated for Psoriatic Arthritis

    August 15, 2018

    New research shows tanezumab may be safe and effective for patients with osteoarthritis pain…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences