Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

New Study Examines Treatment Options for Incomplete Lupus Erythematous

Catherine Kolonko  |  Issue: April 2018  |  April 26, 2018

Some of the most common ACR classification criteria reported by ILE patients included ANA positivity, immunologic disorder, arthritis and hematologic disorder.

“ILE patients usually had milder forms of disease and so had more cutaneous manifestations or arthritis and less severe manifestations, [such as] renal disease or pericardial effusions,” says Dr. James.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Nearly one in five of the ILE patients had major clinical manifestations, and the rate ran higher in African Americans (25.7%) compared with European Americans (14.9%), according to the article.

Some ILE patients had major clinical manifestations that also appeared in the SLE patients, such as serositis, renal disease, hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia. These patients used more medication types and more major immunosuppressants than other ILE patients, according to the article.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Which Medications?

Because no standard treatment recommendations exist for ILE patients, researchers wanted to investigate what medications were used to treat their illness. Study results showed these patients often took the same drugs, such as hydroxychloroquine and corticosteroids, commonly prescribed to classified lupus patients, says Dr. James.

“The thing we found that was slightly surprising was that a subset of individuals who meet three criteria for lupus are receiving immunosuppressive medications or even major immunosuppressive medication …,” she says. “If we knew the ILE patients were not at risk of developing major organ involvement, they might be able to be treated with less toxic medications.”

Information gaps regarding ILE patients is also a research concern, says Dr. James. “Even though our study shows the clinical symptoms the ILE patients have … may be milder than what we think of in systemic lupus, their ILE symptoms as well as their [symptoms] that aren’t part of the classification criteria are definitely impairing their quality of life,” says Dr. James.

Results from serologic testing show ILE patients had fewer autoantibodies and that concentrations were lower when compared with the classified lupus patients. In addition, levels of the B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS), a protein associated with autoantibody production in lupus, were also lower in ILE patients compared with the SLE group.

A subset of ILE patients (36%) had significantly elevated levels of BLyS, and those patients may warrant closer monitoring for future risk of classified SLE. Many lupus patients have elevated levels of BLyS, but the biomarker previously had not been studied in an ILE population, says Dr. James.

“Maybe that would be another marker that would help rheumatologists when they are evaluating patients with a positive ANA who do not yet meet all the ACR criteria for lupus,” she says.

Rheumatologists must remember the classification criteria were developed for use in clinical trials, not as a diagnostic tool.

Preventing Disease Escalation

Dr. Buyon

Dr. Buyon

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Tagged with:Incomplete Lupus ErythematousLupusSLEsystemic lupus erythematous

Related Articles

    Can Lupus Be Prevented? Research Reveals Clues to Who’s Most Likely to Transition to Classified Disease

    February 25, 2020

    How does a patient transition from health to active SLE? This question is the crux of the research conducted by Judith A. James, MD, PhD, and colleagues…

    Lupus often presents with a butterfly rash.

    Top 12: Research in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus at a Glance

    November 18, 2021

    Dr. Pisetsky’s picks for the top research in lupus presented at ACR Convergence 2021.

    2019 EULAR/ACR SLE Classification Criteria Offer Improved Sensitivity & Specificity

    November 6, 2019

    The new EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE offer improved sensitivity and specificity, as well as more accurately reflect the current tests used to clinically diagnose SLE. A positive ANA test is obligatory…

    T Cells in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

    August 1, 2011

    Progress toward targeted therapy

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences