Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Pulse-Echo Ultrasound Useful for Osteoporosis Screening

Will Boggs, MD  |  November 29, 2015

NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—Pulse-echo ultrasound is a useful method for point-of-care osteoporosis screening, researchers from Finland report.

“To effectively increase diagnostic coverage, this kind of device should be in every primary or occupational healthcare unit,” Dr. Janne P. Karjalainen from the University of Eastern Finland in Kuopio tells Reuters Health by email.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Currently, osteoporosis is defined by the World Health Organization as bone mineral density (BMD) 2.5 standard deviations or below the mean for young adults, with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) considered as the gold standard for its diagnosis.

Dr. Karjalainen and colleagues investigated the association between proximal femur BMD and novel pulse-echo ultrasound measurements and suggested diagnostic thresholds for ultrasound density index (DI) in their study of 572 women (ages 20–91 years).

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The ultrasound device provides two indices based on 1) a single-site measurement of cortical thickness at the proximal tibia (DI1); and 2) a three-site measurement of cortical thickness at the distal radius, proximal tibia, and distal tibia (DI3).

DI3 showed a somewhat stronger correlation (r=0.69) with total BMD than did DI1 (r=0.62), the team reports in Osteoporosis International, online on Nov. 10.

Both DI1 and DI3 showed significant differences between osteoporotic and healthy women.

Just over a quarter of women (28.7%) with DI3 between 0.876 (90% sensitivity) and 0.803 (90% specificity) thresholds would require an additional examination by axial DXA to verify their diagnosis. Of these women, 82.5% had an osteopenic/osteoporotic T-score at either the femoral neck or total hip.

About a third of women (32.6%) of women with DI1 between the upper and lower thresholds (0.844 and 0.779, respectively) would require an additional DXA.

DXA examinations needed with FRAX(BMI) would include 57.0% of this cohort of women, whereas the ultrasound approach would reduce the percentage of women requiring DXA to 16%.

“The present thresholds for the application of DI to current osteoporosis management pathways show promise for the technique to decrease the amount of DXA referrals and increase diagnostic coverage,” the researchers conclude. “However, these results need to be confirmed in future studies.”

“Optimally in the future, decisions to treat or not could be based on ultrasound measurement for most of the patients, and only small number would require DXA measurement,” Dr. Karjalainen says.

“Ultrasound could be also applied in conjunction with fracture risk assessment tools (such as FRAX) which would allow not only to assess intrinsic (bone density)-related fracture risk but also extrinsic factors such as history of fracture and parent hip fractures.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsOsteoarthritis and Bone Disorders Tagged with:Osteoporosispulse-echo ultrasoundscreeningUltrasoundWomen

Related Articles

    Unexpected Benefits of Bisphosphonates after Hip Fracture

    February 3, 2012

    Recent trials show this bisphosphonates can reduce subsequent hip fractures and mortality, while remaining cost effective.

    Prevent Osteoporotic Fractures with a Fracture Liaison Service

    May 18, 2019

    Imagine leaving the hospital after suffering a heart attack without being treated for hypertension or being started on a beta blocker. What would we think of the hospital where patients are never educated about the relationship between treating hypertension and reducing myocardial infarction and stroke risk? Unfortunately, this happens every day with osteoporosis and fractures…

    Build Up Bone

    June 1, 2007

    Current management of osteoporosis

    Reading Rheum

    May 1, 2009

    Handpicked Reviews of Contemporary Literature

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences