Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Report on EU’s Experience with Biosimilar Drugs Released: Will U.S. Experience Be Similar?

Vanessa Caceres  |  Issue: October 2017  |  October 17, 2017

“A key difference between the EU and the U.S. biosimilars markets is how they address interchangeability,” Dr. Worthing says. “The EMA does not decide whether a drug is interchangeable with its reference product but rather leaves that decision—and thus, whether a pharmacy can substitute biosimilars automatically—to specific member nations. In the U.S., the FDA has proposed a separate approval process for interchangeable biosimilars that will require switching studies.”

“Biosimilars are not ‘knock-offs’ of their reference products. They are reverse engineered, designed and produced to be as close to the reference product as might be another batch of the reference product,” Dr. Kay says. The evidence so far seems to indicate that interchangeability would be reasonable because biosimilars are so similar to their reference product.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“A big question is how safe it will be to switch from the originator to a biosimilar,” Dr. Cohen says. “You will have nonmedical switching, in which the insurance company will say [a biologic] is not on their formulary or it’s a tier 3 drug, so you must use a biosimilar. I don’t think that will be an issue. We have multiple data that allow for a single switch, and there’s no issue.”

The ACR “strongly supports the FDA’s proposal to require manufacturers use robust switching studies to determine whether alternating between a biosimilar and its reference product impacts the safety or efficacy of the drug. Such studies are vital to achieve a clear understanding of what patients are likely to experience with changing formularies in a multi-payer, multi-state, and ever-changing market. These data should be open and accessible for outside investigators to analyze, and should be made clearly available to prescribing doctors in the interchangeable drug’s label via text or hyperlink. Further, we urge the FDA to consider requiring manufacturers to submit updated and standardized pharmacovigilance data as a prerequisite to certain post-market labeling changes.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Cohen heard a colleague in Europe speculate whether psychologically, patients feel that a drug that is cheaper to use is not as effective as the more expensive counterpart. It’s also common for biologics to undergo very minor manufacturing changes as each batch is produced; although that has not been shown to change the effectiveness of the medication.

Another area of concern is extrapolation of indications, which the European report notes is an approach that has been used over the past decade.1 “If a biosimilar is highly similar to its reference product and has comparable safety and efficacy in one therapeutic indication, safety and efficacy data may be extrapolated to other indications for which the reference medicine is approved,” according to the report. By adhering to this concept, fewer clinical trials are needed to allow use of the biosimilar to be expanded to other disease states.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsDrug Updates Tagged with:AC&Radverse eventsAmerican College of Rheumatology (ACR)BiosimilarsBiosimilars in the EUdrugefficacyEuropeEuropean UnionfindingsinterchangeabilityMedicationoutcomepatient carepricingreportRheumatic DiseaserheumatologistsrheumatologySafetyTreatment

Related Articles

    Marching to the Biosimilar Beat: Questions on Rollout Remain

    September 7, 2023

    The availability of biosimilars for the treatment of patients with rheumatic diseases exploded in 2023. Here’s where we stand and what to expect going forward.

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    April 15, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

    The Biosimilars Debate Heats Up: Potential cost savings weighed against patient health & safety

    March 1, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

    Possible Impact of Biosimilar Infliximab on U.S. Market in Prescriptions, Pricing

    September 8, 2016

    The use of biosimilars for rheuma­tology in the U.S. became a reality when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb), a biosimilar to Remicade (infliximab), in April. What this may mean is increased competition among drug companies with regard to pricing and, therefore, potentially lower costs for U.S. patients, according to Seoyoung…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences