Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Results of SPIRIT: A Head-to-Head Trial of Ixekizumab vs. Adalimumab in Active PsA

Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP  |  Issue: February 2019  |  January 14, 2019

In late December 2018, the results of a large head-to-head superiority trial in adults with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were announced.1 This study was a Phase 3b/4, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial, comparing on-label doses of ixekizumab and adalimumab along with use of concomitant conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).

Blinded outcome assessments were used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab compared with adalimumab in PsA patients who were biologic DMARD-naive over a 52-week treatment period. The primary efficacy endpoints were simultaneous achievement of ACR50 and PASI100 response at Week 24. Major secondary endpoints included demonstration of non-inferiority in ACR50 and superiority in PASI100 in ixekizumab-treated patients compared with adalimumab-treated patients.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Patients (N=566) could be enrolled in the study if they had active PsA and plaque psoriasis (body surface area involvement of at least 3%) and had an inadequate response to at least one conventional DMARD.

Patients with active PsA were randomized to receive a 160 mg starting dose of ixekizumab followed by 80 mg of ixekizumab every four weeks, or 40 mg of adalimumab every two weeks, for a total of 52 weeks. The primary analysis was conducted at Week 24.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Patients who met criteria for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis received a 160 mg starting dose of ixekizumab followed by 80 mg of ixekizumab every two weeks from Week 2 to Week 12, and every four weeks thereafter. Or these patients received 80 mg starting doses of adalimumab followed by 40 mg of adalimumab every two weeks beginning one week after the initial dose.

Ixekizumab met the primary endpoint and all major secondary endpoints. The safety profile for ixekizumab was similar to that previously reported, with no new safety signals identified. The manufacturer plans to submit detailed data from this study to scientific meetings and peer-reviewed journals this year.


Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP, is a freelance medical writer based in New York City and a pharmacist at New York Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital.

Reference

  1. Eli Lilly and Company. News release: Lilly announces positive top-line results for Taltz (ixekizumab) vs. Humira (adalimumab) in a head-to-head (SPIRIT-H2H) superiority study in patients with active psoriatic arthritis. 2018 Dec 17.

Share: 

Filed under:Drug Updates Tagged with:adalimumabixekizumabPsAPsoriatic Arthritis

Related Articles

    Psoriatic Arthritis: Advances in Therapeutics, Imaging & More Presented at ACR Convergence 2022

    December 1, 2022

    PHILADELPHIA—Selecting my top 10 picks for abstracts in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) at the ACR Convergence 2022 meeting was not easy because there was a great deal to review and learn from the 139 abstracts submitted to the meeting. I focused first and foremost on advances in therapeutics that encompassed both new and approved therapeutics, novel…

    Ixekizumab vs. Adalimumab for PsA: How Do They Compare?

    July 1, 2019

    In a study of bDMARD-naive patients with active PsA and skin disease, ixekizumab proved more efficacious than adalimumab…

    Case Report: A Psoriatic Arthritis Patient with Dactylitis & Enthesitis

    September 20, 2018

    A 36-year-old woman presented at the Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center for a second opinion regarding a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). One year prior to our evaluation, she had developed pain and stiffness in her hands, feet, knees, ankles, elbows and shoulders. She had mild plaque psoriasis of the scalp and base of the neck,…

    Clinical Trial of Ixekizumab for Psoriatic Arthritis Shows Positive Results

    October 12, 2016

    A study found that ixekizumab decreases disease activity and increases physical function in biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences