Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

The Law of Unintended Consequences Rears Its Head

Stanley B. Cohen, MD  |  Issue: April 2010  |  April 1, 2010

Stanley B. Cohen, MD

The ACR Advocacy list serve was on fire in December 2009 as members discussed the recent price increase for colchicine. Patients and physicians alike were shocked to discover that Colcrys, a new brand name colchicine, skyrocketed in cost after receiving approval for acute gout and familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), increasing in price from approximately 10 cents a pill to approximately five dollars a pill. For a twice-daily dose, the monthly cost of colchicine increased from $6 to $300! How did this happen, and will our patients be able to manage the sharp price increase for this previously “generic,” technically unapproved, drug?

Colchicine 101

In order to determine how to best respond to this issue, ACR staff researched the use of colchicine and related Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory oversight.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Colchicine was first isolated in 1820 by two French chemists and was included in the first Pharmacopoeia of the United States. Moving ahead almost 120 years to 1938, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act required drugs to be approved by the FDA for safety. Beginning in 1962, Congress required that new drugs must be FDA approved for efficacy as well as safety. The agency also evaluated drugs that had been approved between 1938 and 1962. This did not affect colchicine because it was created prior to 1938. In 2006, the FDA announced a new drug-safety initiative to remove unapproved drugs from the market. The guidance for the initiative, “Marketed Unapproved Drugs—Compliance Policy Guide,” affected colchicine as a marketed unapproved drug that required regulatory approval.

URL Pharma was the first manufacturer to step forward and complete the necessary regulatory testing for FDA approval. During the application process, a significant observation determined for the first time that colchicine toxicity was potentially exacerbated by drugs that inhibit CYP3A4, an enzyme involved in the metabolism of colchicine, and p-gylcoprotein, a protein involved in its oral absorption. Drugs that inhibit CYP3A4 and p-glycoprotein include chlarithromycin, erythromycin, cyclosporine, verapamil, diltiazem, ketaoconcazole, and itraconazole. Many of 169 patients who died presumably due to colchicine toxicity reported to the FDA’s adverse event reporting system (AERS) were on one of these drugs. A placebo-controlled study of colchicine in 184 acute gout patients comparing 1.8 mg over one hour to 4.8 mg over six hours demonstrated similar efficacy in both colchicine treated cohorts with less gastrointestinal toxicity associated with the shorter exposure with reduced dosage. This placebo-controlled study was published in the April 2010 issue of Arthritis & Rheumatism (p. 1060).

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsDrug UpdatesGout and Crystalline ArthritisPresident's Perspective Tagged with:ColchicineDrug SafetyFamilial Mediterranean feverGoutIndustryPatientsSafety

Related Articles

    Colcrys Approval Triggers Questions

    May 1, 2010

    Some rheumatologists question the depth of research and the approval’s implications for patient access

    Colchicine: An Ancient Drug with Modern Uses

    August 11, 2021

    Discovered more than 3,000 years ago, colchicine is one of the oldest drugs still in use today. Like most old remedies, colchicine is a chemical substance found in many plants, most notably in colchicum autumnale, known as wild saffron or autumn crocus. It was mentioned in the oldest Egyptian medical text, Ebers Papyrus (circa 1550…

    The Unapproved-Drugs Initiative Is Coming to an End

    February 16, 2021

    On Friday, Nov. 20, 2020, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published a Notice through the Federal Register announcing the withdrawal of guidance documents that established the Unapproved Drugs Initiative. This Notice brings to an end a 14-year-old program that has been blamed for significantly contributing to the rising cost of some…

    Generic Colchicine Approved for Gout Prophylaxis

    March 1, 2015

    The cost for therapeautic gout treatment may soon go down, thanks to a recent court ruling

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences