Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

The Peripatetitc Theodore Pincus, MD

Gretchen Henkel  |  Issue: July 2007  |  July 1, 2007

He immediately began using the questionnaire in his clinics. “I’ve always been interested in measurement in clinical care,” he says. “That’s what my DNA test was about: measurement. So I’ve always been sort of a ‘quant.’ ”

In 1982, Dr. Pincus inherited a box of records from William Sale, MD, an orthopedic surgery resident who was leaving the university for private practice. Filed inside a carton bearing a Jim Beam whiskey label were records from 75 patients with RA whom Dr. Sale had studied and assessed in 1973.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“That was very far-sighted,” says Dr. Pincus. “I had nothing to do with the assessment, but it included a whole list of questions about daily living as well as joint exams—basically what we do today, but with a less developed methodology.”

The patients had received injections of thiotepa, an antineoplastic alkylating agent. Dr. Pincus was curious how these patients had fared in the nine intervening years because of concern that there might be an increased risk of cancer associated with alkylating agents. He enlisted the help of a medical student, who contacted the patients whose records were in the box. A physical therapist gave Dr. Pincus lessons on performing function measures (grip strength, walking time, and button test), and he began the follow-up with these patients on Saturdays.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Interestingly, Dr. Pincus was able to account for all 75 of the original study patients. “In a way, we were lucky,” he says, “because this part of Tennessee had less population mobility than, say, California and New York.” But even more startling were the results from their efforts. Of the original 75 people, 20 had died—a statistically-significantly higher number than what would have been expected. He also noted severe declines in functional status for almost all the remaining patients. These two findings contradicted the conventional wisdom of the time (based on population studies) that RA was not a severe disease. He also found that premature death in RA could be predicted by two unexpected variables: functional status, as documented on Dr. Sale’s precursor HAQ, and education level.

This was the eureka moment for Dr. Pincus: Outcomes for people with RA could be better predicted by questionnaires than by X-rays or lab tests. His first paper about his findings was initially rejected by many journals; it was then that he realized that promoting the questionnaires as both clinical and research tools would be a struggle.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice SupportProfiles Tagged with:Care TeamPatientsPractice

Related Articles

    Rheumatology’s Mentor

    November 1, 2007

    Halsted R. Holman, MD, couples a stellar career with a knack for helping others achieve their potential

    The Science of MDHAQ/RAPID3 Scores

    December 12, 2011

    Do patient self-reports provide valid data for evidence-based care in rheumatology practice?

    Remote Use of the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ)

    December 18, 2019

    The patient medical history is far more prominent in clinical decisions for rheumatology than for many common chronic diseases in which a gold standard biomarker, such as blood pressure or serum glucose, is applicable to diagnosis and management of all individual patients.1 Components of a subjective patient history may be recorded as structured, quantitative, standard,…

    Glucocorticoid Use in Rheumatoid Arthritis Management Focus of Ongoing Debate

    March 1, 2015

    Questions around prescribing steroids as bridge therapy, in long-term low dosages, or low-dose timed-release formulas, or not at all evoke controversy among rheumatologists

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences